ArticleRoyal Society open science2021
Extraction of urban built-up area based on the fusion of night-time light data and point of interest data.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nighttime light intensity and brightness suitability in urban functional zones.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial light at night: a global disruptor of the night-time environment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- An STP-HSI index method for urban built-up area extraction based on multi-source remote sensing data.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- A New Approach to Monitoring Urban Built-Up Areas in Kunming and Yuxi from 2012 to 2021: Promoting Healthy Urban Development and Efficient Governance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate extraction of urban built-up areas is an important prerequisite for urban planning and construction. As a kind of data that can represent urban spatial form, night-time light data has been widely used in the extraction of urban built-up areas. As one of the geographic open-source big data, point of interest (POI) data has a high spatial coupling with night-time light data, so researchers are beginning to explore the fusion of the two data in order to achieve more accurate extraction of urban built-up areas. However, the current research methods and theoretical applications of the fusion of POI data and night-time light data are still insufficient compared with the dramatically changing urban built-up areas, which needed to be further supplemented and deepened. This study proposes a new method to fuse POI data and night-time light data. The results before and after data fusion are compared, and the accuracy of urban built-up area extracted by different data and methods is analysed. The results show that the data fusion can avoid the shortage of single data and effectively improve the extraction accuracy of urban built-up areas, which is greatly helpful to supplement the study of data fusion in urban built-up areas, and also can provide decision-making guidance for urban planning and construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.