Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34386046›Full record

ArticleKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2021

Early removal of chest drains in patients following off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) is not inferior to standard care - study in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group.

Slawomir Zurek, Arkadiusz Kurowicki, Michal Borys, Artur Iwasieczko, Bogumila Woloszczuk-Gebicka, Miroslaw Czuczwar, Kazimierz Widenka

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Slawomir ZurekClinical Department of Cardiac Surgery, District Hospital No. 2, Rzeszow, Poland.
Arkadiusz KurowickiClinical Department of Cardiac Surgery, District Hospital No. 2, Rzeszow, Poland.
Michal BorysSecond Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Artur IwasieczkoClinical Department of Cardiac Surgery, District Hospital No. 2, Rzeszow, Poland.
Bogumila Woloszczuk-GebickaMedical College, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland.
Miroslaw CzuczwarSecond Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Kazimierz WidenkaClinical Department of Cardiac Surgery, District Hospital No. 2, Rzeszow, Poland.
Rzeszów University · PLMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOnly a few studies have concerned the timing of chest drains' removal in cardiac surgery patients following the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). None of them pertained to the off-pump CABG (OPCAB) procedure.

aimTo compare thoracic drainage time in OPCAB patients before the implementation of the institutional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and after that. MATERIAL AND

methodsIt was a single-center observational study concerning patients following OPCAB. Two groups of patients were analyzed: after implementing the ERAS protocol, the ERAS group, and before this period, the standard care group (STAND group). The primary outcome of this study was to compare postoperative drainage time in the ERAS and STAND groups. The other outcomes included comparing transfused blood products, postoperative complications, surgical technique, postoperative ventilation and the intensive care unit stay time.

resultsSixty patients in the ERAS and 112 in the STAND group were analyzed. The postoperative drainage time was shorter in the ERAS than in the STAND group: 20 (17-22) vs. 30 (27-35) h,

conclusionsThe early removal of chest drains after OPCAB does not increase the risk of postoperative complications and demand for blood products. However, its impact on patients' morbidity needs further studies.

Indexed as

chest drainageEnhanced Recovery After Surgeryoff-pump coronary artery bypass graft

Identifiers

PMID34386046
PMCPMC8340633
OpenAlexW3182048378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.