Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385909›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2021

Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Gerbil: Round Window Assays of Synapse Loss.

Penelope W C Jeffers, Jérôme Bourien, Artem Diuba, Jean-Luc Puel, Sharon G Kujawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phenotypic changes of auditory nerve fibers after excitotoxicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Peristimulus Time Responses Predict Adaptation and Spontaneous Firing of Auditory-Nerve Fibers: From Rodents Data to Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Penelope W C JeffersProgram in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
Jérôme BourienInstitute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Artem DiubaInstitute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Luc PuelInstitute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Sharon G KujawaProgram in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
Eaton (United States) · USUniversité de Montpellier · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Synaptopathy, Neural Pathophysiology and Suprathreshold Processing in Gerbils with Normal or Elevated ThresholdsP50DC015857 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Sharon G Kujawa · 2017 to 2026
$28.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC015857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work in animals with recovered hearing thresholds but permanent inner hair cell synapse loss after noise have suggested initial vulnerability of low spontaneous rate (SR) auditory nerve fibers (ANF). As these fibers have properties of response that facilitate robust sound coding in continuous noise backgrounds, their targeted loss would have important implications for function. To address the issue of relative ANF vulnerabilities after noise, we assessed cochlear physiologic and histologic consequences of temporary threshold shift-producing sound over-exposure in the gerbil, a species with well-characterized distributions of auditory neurons by SR category. The noise exposure targeted a cochlear region with distributed innervation (low-, medium- and high-SR neurons). It produced moderate elevations in outer hair cell-based distortion-product otoacoustic emission and whole nerve compound action potential thresholds in this region, with accompanying reductions in suprathreshold response amplitudes, quantified at 24 h. These parameters of response recovered well with post-exposure time. Chronic synapse loss was maximum in the frequency region initially targeted by the noise. Cochlear round window recorded mass potentials (spontaneous neural noise and sound-driven peri-stimulus time responses, PSTR) reflected parameters of the loss not detected by the conventional assays. Spontaneous activity was acutely reduced. Steady-state (PSTR plateau) activity was correlated with synapse loss in frequency regions with high concentrations of low-SR neurons, whereas the PSTR onset peak and spontaneous round window noise, both dominated by high-SR fiber activity, were relatively unaltered across frequency in chronic ears. Together, results suggest that acute targets of noise were of mixed SR subtypes, but chronic targets were predominantly low-SR neurons. PSTRs captured key properties of the auditory nerve response and vulnerability to injury that should yield important diagnostic information in hearing loss etiologies producing cochlear synaptic and neural loss.

Indexed as

auditory nerve fibercochlear neural degenerationcochlear synaptopathyhair cellnoise-induced hearing lossperi-stimulus time responsesensorineural hearing lossspontaneous rate

Identifiers

PMID34385909
PMCPMC8354318
OpenAlexW3185741694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.