Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385729›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2021

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Telecounseling on the Psychological Problems of Frontline Healthcare Workers Amidst COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial from Central India.

Snehil Gupta, Mohit Kumar, Abhijit R Rozatkar, Devendra Basera, Shashank Purwar, Disha Gautam, Rahat Jahan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Snehil GuptaDept. of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-2917
Mohit KumarDept. of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Abhijit R RozatkarDept. of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-2917
Devendra BaseraDept. of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shashank PurwarDept. of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Disha GautamDept. of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rahat JahanDept. of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreliminary reports suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, telecounseling could be an effective model of psychological intervention for the frontline healthcare workers (fHCW) with psychological problems. Literature is sparse in this area, particularly from low- and middle-income countries, including India. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and the effectiveness of telecounseling (vs. general education) on the psychological problems of the fHCW over three time-points (baseline vs. end-of-session and at two and four weeks after the intervention).

methodsThe study followed a single-blind, active arm versus general education, parallel-group randomized control design, with participant allocation in 1:1. Active healthcare workers (HCWs) with mild- to-severe or clinically concerning scores on any of the sub-scales of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) or Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R; represented by higher scores) were included, while those with known psychiatric illness were excluded. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test and linear-mixed effect model (group-, time, and group by time-effect) were used for analysis.

resultsThere were no baseline group differences (telecounseling group, active arm,

conclusionTelecounseling could be a feasible and scalable model of psychological interventions for the fHCW with psychological problems, albeit with some feasibility challenges.

Indexed as

COVID-19FrontlineHealthcare workersRandomize-control trialTelecounseling

Identifiers

PMID34385729
PMCPMC8327876
OpenAlexW3180639826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.