Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385534›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Low-energy electron beam has severe impact on seedling development compared to cold atmospheric pressure plasma.

A Waskow, D Butscher, G Oberbossel, D Klöti, P Rudolf von Rohr, A Büttner-Mainik, D Drissner, M Schuppler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RNA Sequencing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A WaskowInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Schmelzbergstrasse 7, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
D ButscherInstitute of Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 3, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
G OberbosselInstitute of Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 3, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
D KlötiCompetence Division for Plants and Plant Products, Seed Quality, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.
P Rudolf von RohrInstitute of Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 3, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
A Büttner-MainikCompetence Division for Plants and Plant Products, Seed Quality, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.
D DrissnerDepartment of Life Sciences, Albstadt-Sigmaringen University, Anton-Günther-Strasse 51, 72488, Sigmaringen, Germany.
M SchupplerInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Schmelzbergstrasse 7, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. markus.schuppler@ethz.ch.
ETH Zurich · CHAgroscope · CHAlbstadt-Sigmaringen University · DEÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sprouts are germinated seeds that are often consumed due to their high nutritional content and health benefits. However, the conditions for germination strongly support the proliferation of present bacteria, including foodborne pathogens. Since sprouts are consumed raw or minimally processed, they are frequently linked to cases of food poisoning. Therefore, a seed decontamination method that provides efficient inactivation of microbial pathogens, while maintaining the germination capacity and quality of the seeds is in high demand. This study aimed to investigate and compare seed decontamination by cold atmospheric-pressure plasma and low-energy electron beam with respect to their impact on seed and seedling quality. The results show that both technologies provide great potential for inactivation of microorganisms on seeds, while cold plasma yielded a higher efficiency with 5 log units compared to a maximum of 3 log units after electron beam treatment. Both techniques accelerated seed germination, defined by the percentage of hypocotyl and leaf emergence at 3 days, with short plasma treatment (< 120 s) and all applied doses of electron beam treatment (8-60 kGy). However, even the lowest dose of electron beam treatment at 8 kGy in this study caused root abnormalities in seedlings, suggesting a detrimental effect on the seed tissue. Seeds treated with cold plasma had an eroded seed coat and increased seed wettability compared to electron beam treated seeds. However, these effects cannot explain the increase in the germination capacity of seeds as this was observed for both techniques. Future studies should focus on the investigation of the mechanisms causing accelerated seed germination and root abnormalities by characterizing the molecular and physiological impact of cold plasma and electron beam on seed tissue.

Identifiers

PMID34385534
PMCPMC8360967
OpenAlexW3192770120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.