Trial reportScientific reports2021
Evaluation of acetylation and methylation in oral rinse of patients with head and neck cancer history exposed to valproic acid.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of epigenetics in OSCC: an understanding above genetics.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- Pyrimidine Biosynthetic Enzyme CAD: Its Function, Regulation, and Diagnostic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluate the biological action of valproic acid in the acetylation of histones and in the methylation of tumor suppressor genes via oral rinse in patients with a previous history of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Forty-two active or former smokers were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Oral rinse samples were collected prior to treatment with valproic acid or placebo and after 90 days of treatment. The methylation status of five tumor suppressor genes and histone acetylation were evaluated by pyrosequencing and ELISA techniques, respectively. Differences between the 90-day and baseline oral rinse acetylation and methylation results were analyzed by comparing groups. Thirty-four patients were considered for analysis. The mean percentage adherence in the valproic and placebo groups was 93.4 and 93.0, respectively (p = 0.718). There was no statistically significant difference between groups when comparing the medians of the histone acetylation ratio and the methylation ratio for most of the studied genes. A significant reduction in the DCC methylation pattern was observed in the valproic group (p = 0.023). The use of valproic acid was safe and accompanied by good therapeutic adherence. DCC methylation was lower in the valproic acid group than in the placebo group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.