Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385361›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Implicit Neurofeedback Training of Feature-Based Attention Promotes Biased Sensory Processing during Integrative Decision-Making.

Angela I Renton, David R Painter, Jason B Mattingley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of brain self-regulation: psychological factors, mechanistic models and neural substrates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela I RentonUniversity of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, 4072 Queensland, Australia angie.renton23@gmail.com.
David R PainterSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072 Queensland, Australia.
Jason B MattingleyUniversity of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, 4072 Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-9216
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAGriffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex perceptual decisions, in which information must be integrated across multiple sources of evidence, are ubiquitous but are not well understood. Such decisions rely on sensory processing of each individual source of evidence, and are therefore vulnerable to bias if sensory processing resources are disproportionately allocated among visual inputs. To investigate this, we developed an implicit neurofeedback protocol embedded within a complex decision-making task to bias sensory processing in favor of one source of evidence over another. Human participants of both sexes (

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionBrainDecision MakingElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleNeurofeedbackOrientation, SpatialPerceptionReaction TimeVisual PerceptionYoung Adultfeature-based attentionforward encodingimplicit neurofeedbackintegrative decision-makingsensory processingSSVEPs

Identifiers

PMID34385361
PMCPMC8482867
OpenAlexW3191962002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.