Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385321›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

A nanobody activating metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 discriminates between homo- and heterodimers.

Jordi Haubrich, Joan Font, Robert B Quast, Anne Goupil-Lamy, Pauline Scholler, Damien Nevoltris, Francine Acher, Patrick Chames, Philippe Rondard, Laurent Prézeau and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Epitope-directed selection of GPCR nanobody ligands with evolvable function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jordi HaubrichInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-3801
Joan FontInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Robert B QuastCentre de Biologie Structurale, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8166-6952
Anne Goupil-LamyBIOVIA Science Council, Dassault Système, F-78140, Vélizy-Villacoublay Cedex, France.
Pauline SchollerInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Damien NevoltrisInstitut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, 13009 Marseille, France.
Francine AcherFaculté des Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Université de Paris, CNRS, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-4181
Patrick ChamesInstitut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-6286
Philippe RondardInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-2738
Laurent PrézeauInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; laurent.prezeau@igf.cnrs.fr jean-philippe.pin@igf.cnrs.fr.
Jean-Philippe PinInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; laurent.prezeau@igf.cnrs.fr jean-philippe.pin@igf.cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1423-345X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in developing biologics due to their high target selectivity. The G protein-coupled homo- and heterodimeric metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors regulate many synapses and are promising targets for the treatment of numerous brain diseases. Although subtype-selective allosteric small molecules have been reported, their effects on the recently discovered heterodimeric receptors are often not known. Here, we describe a nanobody that specifically and fully activates homodimeric human mGlu4 receptors. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis studies revealed that the nanobody acts by stabilizing the closed active state of the glutamate binding domain by interacting with both lobes. In contrast, this nanobody does not activate the heterodimeric mGlu2-4 but acts as a pure positive allosteric modulator. These data further reveal how an antibody can fully activate a class C receptor and bring further evidence that nanobodies represent an alternative way to specifically control mGlu receptor subtypes.

Indexed as

Single-Domain AntibodiesGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, BiologicalMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, Metabotropic Glutamatemetabotropic glutamate receptor 4Receptors, Metabotropic GlutamateSingle-Domain Antibodiesactivation mechanismagonistG protein–coupled receptorsingle-domain antibody

Identifiers

PMID34385321
PMCPMC8379968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.