Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385310›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Shared understanding of color among sighted and blind adults.

Judy Sein Kim, Brianna Aheimer, Verónica Montané Manrara, Marina Bedny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language prediction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Learning about color from language.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The origin of color categories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Strong Prediction: Language Model Surprisal Explains Multiple N400 Effects.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The vision of dreams: from ontogeny to dream engineering in blindness.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Judy Sein KimDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218; judy.kim@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5808-4081
Brianna AheimerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Verónica Montané ManraraDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Marina BednyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-8042

Funding

Visual cortex plasticity in blindness: a window into flexibility of human cortexR01EY027352 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEDNY, MARINA · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empiricist philosophers such as Locke famously argued that people born blind might learn arbitrary color facts (e.g., marigolds are yellow) but would lack color understanding. Contrary to this intuition, we find that blind and sighted adults share causal understanding of color, despite not always agreeing about arbitrary color facts. Relative to sighted people, blind individuals are less likely to generate "yellow" for banana and "red" for stop sign but make similar generative inferences about real and novel objects' colors, and provide similar causal explanations. For example, people infer that two natural kinds (e.g., bananas) and two artifacts with functional colors (e.g., stop signs) are more likely to have the same color than two artifacts with nonfunctional colors (e.g., cars). People develop intuitive and inferentially rich "theories" of color regardless of visual experience. Linguistic communication is more effective at aligning intuitive theories than knowledge of arbitrary facts.

Indexed as

BlindnessColor VisionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultblindnesscolorintuitive theorieslanguage

Identifiers

PMID34385310
PMCPMC8379969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.