Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385275›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2022

Laura Succony, Sandra Gómez-López, Adam Pennycuick, Ahmed S N Alhendi, Derek Davies, Sarah E Clarke, Kate H C Gowers, Nicholas A Wright, Kim B Jensen, Sam M Janes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Regenerative Role of Lrig1+ Cells in Kidney Repair.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2024
    Article
  8. Basic Science Perspective on Engineering and Modeling the Large Airways.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura SucconyLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Sandra Gómez-LópezLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-6066
Adam PennycuickLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Ahmed S N AlhendiLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1883-2142
Derek DaviesFlow Cytometry Facility, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Sarah E ClarkeLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Kate H C GowersLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Nicholas A WrightCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Kim B JensenBiotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology, DanStem, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sam M JanesLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK s.janes@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-5939
University College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBThe London College · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council G108/596Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT107963AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) accounts for a significant proportion of cancer deaths worldwide, and is preceded by the appearance of progressively disorganised pre-invasive lesions in the airway epithelium. Yet the biological mechanisms underlying progression of pre-invasive lesions into invasive LUSC are not fully understood. METHODS AND

resultsUsing an

conclusionTogether, our findings identify LRIG1 as a marker of basal airway progenitor cells with high proliferative potential and as a regulator of pre-invasive lung cancer progression. This work highlights the clinical relevance of LRIG1 and the potential of the NTCU-induced LUSC model for functional assessment of candidate tumour suppressors and oncogenes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellLung NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansLungMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceNerve Tissue ProteinsOncogenesLRIG1 protein, humanLrig1 protein, mouseMembrane GlycoproteinsNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34385275
PMCPMC8968013
OpenAlexW3191549569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.