Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385253›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Scope, context and quality of telerehabilitation guidelines for physical disabilities: a scoping review.

Krithika Anil, Jennifer A Freeman, Sarah Buckingham, Sara Demain, Hilary Gunn, Ray B Jones, Angela Logan, Jonathan Marsden, Diane Playford, Kim Sein and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Quality Appraisal of Telerehabilitation Guidelines: A Systematic Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stakeholders' Experiences Using Videoconferencing for a Group-Based Stroke Intervention During COVID-19: A Thematic Analysis.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Krithika AnilSchool of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK krithika.anil@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8027-1665
Jennifer A FreemanSchool of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Sarah BuckinghamSchool of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Sara DemainSchool of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Hilary GunnSchool of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Ray B JonesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-3421
Angela LoganStroke Rehabilitation, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Jonathan MarsdenSchool of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Diane PlayfordWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Kim SeinSchool of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Bridie KentSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.
University of Plymouth · GBHealth Innovations (United States) · USRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V021060/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the available guidance and training to implement telerehabilitation movement assessments for people (adults and children) with a physical disability, including those recovering from COVID-19.

designRapid scoping review. INCLUDED SOURCES AND ARTICLES: PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, PEDro, UK Health Forum, WHO, National Archives and NHS England were searched using the participant-concept-context framework from 2015 to August 2020. Primary studies that recruited individuals with physical disabilities and guidance documents aimed at providers to implement movement-related telerehabilitation were included.

results23 articles (11 primary research studies, 3 systematic reviews and 9 guidance documents) were included out of 7857 that were identified from the literature search. Two main issues were found: (1) telerehabilitation guidance (from both research studies and guidance documents) was not specific to movement-related assessment and (2) most primary research studies provided neither guidance nor training of movement-specific assessment to practitioners. Of the COVID-19 related guidance, two articles reported COVID-19 management that only referred to identifying COVID-19 status without references to specific movement-related guidance.

conclusionsTelerehabilitation guidance and training have existed pre-COVID-19, yet the lack of specific movement-related information and provider support is surprising. This gap must be addressed to optimise effective implementation of remote assessments for those with physical disabilities. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework: osf.io/vm6sp.

Indexed as

COVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesTelerehabilitationChildEnglandHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19physiologyprotocols & guidelinesrehabilitation medicinetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34385253
PMCPMC8361705
OpenAlexW3192312501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.