Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385159›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Trends and outcomes in primary health care expenditures in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000-2017.

Matthew T Schneider, Angela Y Chang, Sawyer W Crosby, Stephen Gloyd, Anton C Harle, Stephen Lim, Rafael Lozano, Angela E Micah, Golsum Tsakalos, Yanfang Su and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthew T SchneiderInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA mtschneider13@gmail.com.
Angela Y ChangDanish Institute for Advanced Study, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sawyer W CrosbyInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephen GloydDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Anton C HarleInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephen LimInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rafael LozanoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Angela E MicahInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0190-1017
Golsum TsakalosInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Yanfang SuDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Christopher J L MurrayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Joseph L DielemanInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs the world responds to COVID-19 and aims for the Sustainable Development Goals, the potential for primary healthcare (PHC) is substantial, although the trends and effectiveness of PHC expenditure are unknown. We estimate PHC expenditure for each low-income and middle-income country between 2000 and 2017 and test which health outputs and outcomes were associated with PHC expenditure.

methodsWe used three data sources to estimate PHC expenditures: recently published health expenditure estimates for each low-income and middle-income country, which were constructed using 1662 country-reported National Health Accounts; proprietary data from IQVIA to estimate expenditure of prescribed pharmaceuticals for PHC; and household surveys and costing estimates to estimate inpatient vaginal delivery expenditures. We employed regression analyses to measure the association between PHC expenditures and 15 health outcomes and intermediate health outputs.

resultsPHC expenditures in low-income and middle-income countries increased between 2000 and 2017, from $41 per capita (95% uncertainty interval $33-$49) to $90 ($73-$105). Expenditures for low-income countries plateaued since 2014 at $17 per capita ($15-$19). As national income increased, the proportion of health expenditures on PHC generally decrease; however, the fraction of PHC expenditures spent via ambulatory care providers grew. Increases in the fraction of health expenditures on PHC was associated with lower maternal mortality rate (p value≤0.001), improved coverage of antenatal care visits (p value≤0.001), measles vaccination (p value≤0.001) and an increase in the Health Access and Quality index (p value≤0.05). PHC expenditure was not systematically associated with all-age mortality, communicable and non-communicable disease (NCD) burden.

conclusionPHC expenditures were associated with maternal and child health but were not associated with reduction in health burden for other key causes of disability, such as NCDs. To combat changing disease burdens, policy-makers and health professionals need to adapt primary healthcare to ensure continued impact on emerging health challenges.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health ExpendituresChildDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansPregnancyPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2health economics

Identifiers

PMID34385159
PMCPMC8362721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.