Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34385158›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2021

Are current preventive chemotherapy strategies for controlling and eliminating neglected tropical diseases cost-effective?

Hugo C Turner, Wilma A Stolk, Anthony W Solomon, Jonathan D King, Antonio Montresor, David H Molyneux, Jaspreet Toor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic sensitivity of formalin-fixed faecal microscopy for the detection of soil-transmitted helminths.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hugo C TurnerMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK hugo.turner@imperial.ac.uk.
Wilma A StolkDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anthony W SolomonDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jonathan D KingDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Antonio MontresorDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
David H MolyneuxDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Jaspreet ToorMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
World Health Organization · CHErasmus MC · NLImperial College London · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in many low-income and middle-income countries. Several NTDs, namely lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH) and trachoma, are predominantly controlled by preventive chemotherapy (or mass drug administration), following recommendations set by the WHO. Over one billion people are now treated for NTDs with this strategy per year. However, further investment and increased domestic healthcare spending are urgently needed to continue these programmes. Consequently, it is vital that the cost-effectiveness of preventive chemotherapy is understood. We analyse the current estimates on the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of the preventive chemotherapy strategies predominantly used for these diseases and identify key evidence gaps that require further research. Overall, the reported estimates show that preventive chemotherapy is generally cost-effective, supporting WHO recommendations. More specifically, the cost per DALY averted estimates relating to community-wide preventive chemotherapy for lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis were particularly favourable when compared with other public health interventions. Cost per DALY averted estimates of school-based preventive chemotherapy for schistosomiasis and STH were also generally favourable but more variable. Notably, the broader socioeconomic benefits are likely not being fully captured by the DALYs averted metric. No estimates of cost per DALY averted relating to community-wide mass antibiotic treatment for trachoma were found, highlighting the need for further research. These findings are important for informing global health policy and support the need for continuing NTD control and elimination efforts.

Indexed as

HelminthiasisTropical MedicineCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansNeglected DiseasesQuality-Adjusted Life Yearshealth economicsonchocerciasisschistosomiasissoil-transmitted helminth infectionstrachoma

Identifiers

PMID34385158
PMCPMC8362715
OpenAlexW3189338891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.