Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34384772›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2021

Further implications from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening: per-protocol and as-treated estimates.

Teresa A Hillier, Kathryn L Pedula, Keith K Ogasawara, Kimberly K Vesco, Caryn E S Oshiro, Suzanne L Lubarsky, Jan Van Marter

Abstract readLetterPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teresa A HillierCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227; Center for Integrated Health Care Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI. Electronic address: Teresa.Hillier@kpchr.org.
Kathryn L PedulaCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR; Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, Honolulu, HI.
Keith K OgasawaraDivision of Perinatology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, Honolulu, HI.
Kimberly K VescoCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.
Caryn E S OshiroCenter for Integrated Health Care Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.
Suzanne L LubarskyDivision of Perinatology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente, Clackamas, OR.
Jan Van MarterCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.

Funding

Comparing Two Gestational Diabetes Screening Methods: A Pragmatic Outpatient RCTR01HD074794 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HILLIER, TERESA A · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningPatient CompliancePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34384772
PMCPMC9172629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.