Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34384513›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2022

Evaluation of the 'H2NOE Water Schools' programme to promote water consumption in elementary schoolchildren: a non-randomised controlled cluster trial.

Ursula Griebler, Viktoria Titscher, Michael Weber, Lisa Affengruber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03852173 (Process and Outcome Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase the Water Consumption of Elementary School Children in Lower Austria - a Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03852173 nacompletednot on this map

Process and Outcome Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase the Water Consumption of Elementary School Children in Lower Austria - a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanube University KremsRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,485ConditionsWater Consumption, Drinking BehaviorArmsWasserschulen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ursula GrieblerDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-3714
Viktoria TitscherDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500Krems, Austria.
Michael WeberDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel, Vienna, Austria.
Lisa AffengruberDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500Krems, Austria.
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems · ATMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated a simple environmental intervention called 'Water Schools' in Lower Austria providing free refillable water bottles and educational material.

designNon-randomised controlled cluster trial with three measurements: at baseline (T0), after the intervention at 9 months (T1) and after 1-year follow-up (T2).

settingHalf-day elementary schools in Lower Austria (Austria).

participantsThird-grade pupils from twenty-two schools in the intervention group (IG) and thirty-two schools in the control group (CG) participated in the study. Data were analysed for 569 to 598 pupils in the IG and for 545 to 613 in the CG, depending on the time of measurement.

resultsThe consumption of tap water increased in the IG from baseline to T1 and then decreased again at T2, but this was similar in the CG (no statistically significant difference in the time trend between the IG and CG). Similar results were seen for tap water consumption in the mornings. The proportion of children who only drank tap water on school mornings increased significantly from baseline to T1 in the IG compared to the CG (P = 0·020). No difference in the changes over time occurred between the groups for the proportion of pupils drinking approximately one bottle of tap water during school mornings.

conclusionsNot only the children in the IG but also those in the CG drank more tap water after 1 school year than at the beginning. The measurement of drinking habits in the CG may have been intervention enough to bring about changes or to initiate projects.

Indexed as

DrinkingHealth PromotionAustriaChildHumansSchoolsNon-randomised controlled studySchool health promotionWater consumption

Identifiers

PMID34384513
PMCPMC8825982
OpenAlexW3187910730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.