ArticleSystematic reviews2021
The assessment of general movements in term and late-preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy, as a predictive tool of cerebral palsy by 2 years of age-a scoping review.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of a Physiotherapy Intervention to Improve Feeding Skills in Preterm Infants
Effects of a Treatment Program Based on the Bobath Concept After Hospital Discharge in Children Born Very Preterm
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of outcome following neonatal encephalopathy in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Trunk Kinematics in Writhing and Fidgety Movements: A Pilot Study on Early Postural Control in Infants Using Computer Vision.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and metabolome signatures in preterm infants with high versus low risk for neurodevelopmental impairment: a prospective, matched, longitudinal multi-omics study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Emerging modalities for neuroprognostication in neonatal encephalopathy: harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- The control of movement gradually transitions from feedback control to feedforward adaptation throughout childhood.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Clinical utility and psychometric properties of tools for early detection of developmental concerns and disability in young children: A scoping review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- The General Movement Optimality Score-Revised (GMOS-R) with Socioeconomically Stratified Percentile Ranks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Machine learning approaches to evaluate infants' general movements in the writhing stage-a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Automated Movement Analysis to Predict Cerebral Palsy in Very Preterm Infants: An Ambispective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe General Movements Assessment is a non-invasive and cost-effective tool with demonstrated reliability for identifying infants at risk for cerebral palsy. Early detection of cerebral palsy allows for the implementation of early intervention and is associated with better functional outcomes. No review to date has summarized the utility of the General Movements Assessment to predict cerebral palsy in term and late-preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review involving infants born greater than or equal to 34 weeks gestational age to identify all available evidence and delineate research gaps. We extracted data on sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and described the strengths and limitations of the results. We searched five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL) and the General Movements Trust website. Two reviewers conducted all screening and data extraction independently. The articles were categorized according to key findings, and a critical appraisal was performed.
resultsOnly three studies, a cohort and two case series, met all of the inclusion criteria. The total number of participants was 118. None of the final eligible studies included late-preterm neonates. All three studies reported on sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values. An abnormal General Movement Assessment at 3-5 months has a high specificity (84.6-98%) for cerebral palsy with a similarly high negative predictive value (84.6-98%) when it was normal. Absent fidgety movements, in particular, are highly specific (96%) for moderate to severe cerebral palsy and carry a high negative predictive value (98%) when normal. In the time period between term and 4-5 months post-term, any cramped synchronized movements had results of 100% sensitivity and variable results for specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
conclusionsA normal General Movements Assessment at 3 months in a term high-risk infant is likely associated with a low risk for moderate/severe cerebral palsy. The finding of cramped synchronized General Movements is a strong predictor for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy by 2 years of age in the term population with neonatal encephalopathy. The deficit of high-quality research limits the applicability, and so the General Movements Assessment should not be used in isolation when assessing this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Title registration with Joanna Briggs Institute. URL: http://joannabriggswebdev.org/research/registered_titles.aspx .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.