Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34384405›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Informing Proactive integrated virtual healthcare resource use in primary care.

Jolie N Haun, Bridget A Cotner, Christine Melillo, Vanessa Panaite, William Messina, Shilpa Patel-Teague, Brian Zilka

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jolie N HaunResearch and Development Service, James A. Haley VA Hospital and Clinics, 8900 Grand Oak Circle (151R), Tampa, FL, 33637-1022, USA.
Bridget A CotnerResearch and Development Service, James A. Haley VA Hospital and Clinics, 8900 Grand Oak Circle (151R), Tampa, FL, 33637-1022, USA.
Christine MelilloResearch and Development Service, James A. Haley VA Hospital and Clinics, 8900 Grand Oak Circle (151R), Tampa, FL, 33637-1022, USA. Christine.Melillo@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-6605
Vanessa PanaiteResearch and Development Service, James A. Haley VA Hospital and Clinics, 8900 Grand Oak Circle (151R), Tampa, FL, 33637-1022, USA.
William MessinaJames A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
Shilpa Patel-TeagueVeterans Integrated Service Network 8 Network Office, St Petersburg, FL, USA.
Brian ZilkaJames A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital · USUniversity of South Florida · USAction Network · US

Funding

Virtual Medical Modality Implementation Strategies for Patient Aligned Care Teams to Promote Veteran Centered CareI01HX002010 · VA · JAMES A. HALEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HAUN, JOLIE N. · 2018 to 2021
–
HSRD VA I01 HX002010HSRD VA IK2 HX002899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProactive integrated virtual healthcare resource (VHR) use can improve efficiency, maximize resource capacity for delivering optimal coordinated care and improve patient outcomes. Proactive integrated VHR use is vital for delivering high quality care. Our objectives were to identify proactive integrated VHR use among primary care teams, best practices and targeted implementation strategies to promote proactive integrated VHR use.

methodsThis is a mixed-method descriptive study. We employed a community-based participatory approach to collect data and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to analyze and contextualize findings. A cross-sectional sample of primary care team members (n = 65) from a Department of Veterans Affairs medical center participated in focus groups, follow-up interviews (n = 16), and respond to self-report surveys. Operational subject matter experts (n = 15) participated in informant interviews.

resultsSurvey data described current use and factors that influenced singular VHR use and were convergent with qualitative findings. Focus group and interview data described no evidence of proactive integrated VHR use. Differences and similarities were identified between both utilization groups, such as facilitators and barriers, recommendations, patient education and preferred implementation strategies. All groups reported issues around VHR availability knowledge and access and functionality. Participants identified the need for best practices that are specific to care tasks and performance measures. Expert informant interviews identified a list of VHR tools that could be proactively integrated across the healthcare continuum.

conclusionsHealth systems are leveraging technologies to proactively integrate VHR to maximize information exchange, clinical decision support and patient engagement. VHR is critical during global pandemics, such as COVID-19, to maintain access to care coordination and delivery while abiding by public health recommendations. Though recent requirements for reducing contact create an intrinsic motivation, cultural change through education and best practices of proactive integrated use across the healthcare continuum is needed to create a culture of VHR super users.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Clinical decision supportPatient engagementPrimary careTechnologyVeteranVirtual healthcare resources

Identifiers

PMID34384405
PMCPMC8358911
OpenAlexW3189829032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.