Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34384387›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Health providers' and pregnant women's perspectives about smoking cessation support: a COM-B analysis of a global systematic review of qualitative studies.

Ratika Kumar, Leah Stevenson, Judith Jobling, Yael Bar-Zeev, Parivash Eftekhari, Gillian S Gould

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Factors Associated With Not Smoking and Ceasing Smoking During Pregnancy Among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ratika Kumar *School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Leah Stevenson *School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Judith JoblingSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Yael Bar-ZeevBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine Hebrew University - Hadassah Medical Center, PO Box 12272, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Parivash EftekhariSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Gillian S GouldSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia. Gillian.Gould@Newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8489-2576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking cessation in pregnancy has unique challenges. Health providers (HP) may need support to successfully implement smoking cessation care (SCC) for pregnant women (PW). We aimed to synthesize qualitative data about views of HPs and PW on SCC during pregnancy using COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) framework.

methodsA systematic search of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) using PRISMA guidelines. PW's and HPs' quotes, as well as the authors' analysis, were extracted and double-coded (30%) using the COM-B framework.

resultsThirty-two studies included research from 5 continents: twelve on HPs' perspectives, 16 on PW's perspectives, four papers included both. HPs' capability and motivation were affected by role confusion and a lack of training, time, and resources to provide interventions. HPs acknowledged that advice should be delivered while taking women's psychological state (capability) and stressors into consideration. Pregnant women's physical capabilities to quit (e.g., increased metabolism of nicotine and dependence) was seldom addressed due to uncertainty about nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use in pregnancy. Improving women's motivation to quit depended on explaining the risks of smoking versus the safety of quit methods. Women considered advice from HPs during antenatal visits as effective, if accompanied by resources, peer support, feedback, and encouragement.

conclusionsHPs found it challenging to provide effective SCC due to lack of training, time, and role confusion. The inability to address psychological stress in women and inadequate use of pharmacotherapy were additional barriers. These findings could aid in designing training programs that address HPs' and PW's attitudes and supportive campaigns for pregnant smokers.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchSmoking CessationCounselingFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansModels, PsychologicalMotivationPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareCOM-BHealth professionalsHealth servicesPregnant womenQualitativeSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID34384387
PMCPMC8359058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.