Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34384377›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Does post-operative radiotherapy improve the treatment outcomes of intracranial hemangiopericytoma? A retrospective study.

Jianbiao Xiao, Lanwei Xu, Yi Ding, Wei Wang, Fen Chen, Yangshu Zhou, Fengjiao Zhang, Qiyuan Zhou, Xuehui Wu, Junpeng Li and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jianbiao Xiao *Department of Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University, 1838, Guangzhoudadao Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Lanwei Xu *Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Yi DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Pathology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, People's Liberation Army of China, Guangzhou, China.
Fen ChenRadiotherapy Center, Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital, Chenzhou, Hunan Province, China.
Yangshu ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Fengjiao ZhangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shanghai Concord Medical Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Qiyuan ZhouRadiotherapy Center, Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital, Chenzhou, Hunan Province, China.
Xuehui WuDepartment of Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University, 1838, Guangzhoudadao Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Junpeng LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, People's Liberation Army of China, Guangzhou, China.
Li LiangDepartment of Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University, 1838, Guangzhoudadao Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510515, People's Republic of China. redsnow007@hotmail.com.
Yee-Min JenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yee Zen General Hospital, 30, Yangxing North Rd, Yang Mei District, Tao Yuan City, Taiwan. yeeminjen@chmsc.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5869-9940
Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNChenzhou First People's Hospital · CNGeneral Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command · CNNanfang Hospital · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNShanghai Cancer Institute · CNTao Yuan General Hospital · TWZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672821National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872041National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial hemangiopericytoma is a rare disease and surgery is the mainstay treatment. Although postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy is often used, there are no reports comparing different radiotherapy techniques. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of post-operative radiotherapy and different radiotherapy technique on the results in patients with intracranial hemangiopericytoma (HPC).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 66 intracranial HPC patients treated between 1999 and 2019 including 29 with surgery followed by radiotherapy (11 with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 18 with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)) and 37 with surgery alone. Chi-square test was used to compare the clinical characteristic between the groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine prognostic factors of survival. We also underwent a matched-pair analysis by using the propensity score method.

resultsThe crude local control rates were 58.6% in the surgery plus post-operative radiotherapy group (PORT) and 67.6% in the surgery alone group (p = 0.453). In the subgroup analysis of the PORT patients, local controls were 72.7% in the IMRT group and 50% in the SRS group (p = 0.228). The median OS in the PORT and surgery groups were 122 months and 98 months, respectively (p = 0.169). The median RFS was 96 months in the PORT group and 72 months in the surgery alone group (p = 0.714). Regarding radiotherapy technique, the median OS and RFS of the SRS group were not significantly different from those in the IMRT group (p = 0.256, 0.960). The median RFS were 112 and 72 months for pathology grade II and III patients, respectively (p = 0.001). Propensity score matching did not change the observed results.

conclusionIn this retrospective analysis, PORT did not improve the local control rates nor the survivals. The local control rates after IMRT and SRS were similar even though the IMRT technique had a much higher biological dose compared with the SRS technique.

Indexed as

Postoperative CareAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHemangiopericytomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProportional Hazards ModelsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedIntensity- modulated radiotherapyIntracranial hemangiopericytomaPost-operative radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID34384377
PMCPMC8359034
OpenAlexW3198823367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.