ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2021
Role of microRNAs as biomarkers of cervical carcinogenesis: a systematic review.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating non-coding RNA profiling with HPV genotyping for cervical cancer risk stratification and early detection.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- MicroRNA Dysregulation in HPV-Driven Cervical Cancer: A Review of Oncoprotein-Targeted Signaling Pathways.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- RBBP6 and cancer: from molecular mechanisms to clinical implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Recent advancement in inflammatory biomarkers for cervical cancer diagnosis and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- miR-21-5p inhibitor enhances the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer cells via blocking CPEB3-mediated CDK1/cyclin B pathway.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Publication trends and hotspots for cervical cancer screening biomarker: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Decoding impact of human papillomavirus in gynecological oncology: a narrative review.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Dual Regulation and Clinical Application of miR-34 in Virus-Related Tumors Through Anti-Viral Immunity and Tumor Suppression.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- The diagnostic accuracy of serum and plasma microRNAs in detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: A systematic review andGynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- miR-203, fine-tunning neuroinflammation by juggling different components of NF-κB signaling.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2022Article
- FNDC3B and BPGM Are Involved in Human Papillomavirus-Mediated Carcinogenesis of Cervical Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a systematic review to identify the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers in the progression of cervical precancerous lesions. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Embase databases was performed for articles published between January 2010 and June 2020. The following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were searched: "microRNA" and "cervical" and "lesion." All study designs that aimed to evaluate the correlation of miRNA expression with different precancerous cervical staging and/or cervical cancer were included, except for case reports and case series. Approximately 82 individual miRNAs were found to be significant in differentiating the stages of cervical carcinogenesis. Among the miRNAs, miR-21 is the most prevalent, and it is consistently upregulated progressively from normal cervical to worsening cervical lesion stages in both cell and serum samples. miR-205 has been shown to have a higher specificity than human papilloma virus testing in predicting the absence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) in exfoliated cell samples. The tumor suppressor miRNAs miR-34, let-7, miR-203 miR-29, and miR-375 were significantly downregulated in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, HSILs, and cervical cancer. We found significant dysregulated miRNAs in cervical carcinogenesis with their dynamic expression changes and ability to detect viral persistency, risk prediction of low-grade lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 2) to high-grade lesions (CIN 3), and progression of CIN 3 to cancer. Their ability to discriminate HSILs from non-dysplastic lesions has potential implications in early diagnosis and reducing overtreatment of otherwise regressive early preinvasive lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.