Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383897›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Feasibility of replacing the ICD-10-CM with the ICD-11 for morbidity coding: A content analysis.

Kin Wah Fung, Julia Xu, Shannon McConnell-Lamptey, Donna Pickett, Olivier Bodenreider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Transformative Innovation to Clinical Coding for Better Data and Less Burden.Advances in health information science and practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ICD-11 Morbidity Pilot in Kuwait: Methodology and Lessons Learned for Future Implementation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kin Wah FungNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0593-5377
Julia XuNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Shannon McConnell-LampteyNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
Donna PickettNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
Olivier BodenreiderNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-4217

Funding

Medical Ontology ResearchZIALM010017 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI BODENREIDER, OLIVIER · 2021 to 2023
$6.0M
Intramural NIH HHSNLM NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to assess the feasibility of replacing the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) with the International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision (ICD-11) for morbidity coding based on content analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe most frequently used ICD-10-CM codes from each chapter covering 60% of patients were identified from Medicare claims and hospital data. Each ICD-10-CM code was recoded in the ICD-11, using postcoordination (combination of codes) if necessary. Recoding was performed by 2 terminologists independently. Failure analysis was done for cases where full representation was not achieved even with postcoordination. After recoding, the coding guidance (inclusions, exclusions, and index) of the ICD-10-CM and ICD-11 codes were reviewed for conflict.

resultsOverall, 23.5% of 943 codes could be fully represented by the ICD-11 without postcoordination. Postcoordination is the potential game changer. It supports the full representation of 8.6% of 943 codes. Moreover, with the addition of only 9 extension codes, postcoordination supports the full representation of 35.2% of 943 codes. Coding guidance review identified potential conflicts in 10% of codes, but mostly not affecting recoding. The majority of the conflicts resulted from differences in granularity and default coding assumptions between the ICD-11 and ICD-10-CM.

conclusionsWith some minor enhancements to postcoordination, the ICD-11 can fully represent almost 60% of the most frequently used ICD-10-CM codes. Even without postcoordination, 23.5% full representation is comparable to the 24.3% of ICD-9-CM codes with exact match in the ICD-10-CM, so migrating from the ICD-10-CM to the ICD-11 is not necessarily more disruptive than from the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification to the ICD-10-CM. Therefore, the ICD-11 (without a CM) should be considered as a candidate to replace the ICD-10-CM for morbidity coding.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesMedicareAgedClinical CodingFeasibility StudiesHumansMorbidityUnited Statescontrolled medical vocabulariesICD-10ICD-10-CMICD-11medical terminologies

Identifiers

PMID34383897
PMCPMC8510319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.