Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383885›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2022

Actions during the COVID-19 pandemic to protect the most vulnerable population: what is the potency amid chaos?

Monique Oliveira, Maria Fernanda Braga, Alessandra Bueno, Douglas Pereira de Sousa, Pamela Lamarca Pigozi, Rubens Moryia, Marco Akerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monique OliveiraSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, CEP 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda BragaSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, CEP 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Alessandra BuenoSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, CEP 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Douglas Pereira de SousaSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, CEP 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Pamela Lamarca PigoziSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, CEP 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Rubens MoryiaSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, CEP 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Marco AkermanSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, CEP 01246-904, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1522-8000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By 30 May 2021, Brazil had 16 471 600 COVID-19 cases and 461 142 deaths, ranking second in the world in number of deaths and third in number of cases. Preliminary research results in Brazil and around the world show the impact of COVID-19 on more vulnerable communities. However, despite the adverse circumstances of their territories, leaders have mobilized to face the challenges. Between April and June 2020, the authors of this article interviewed informants in eight Brazilian state capitals, addressing the five points of discussion (intersectoriality, sustainability, empowerment and public participation, equity and the life cycle perspective) recently presented by EUPHA-HP, IUHPE and UNESCO Chair Global Health & Education. Official actions and documents from the Ministry of Health and Municipal Health Departments (SMS) of each capital were also analyzed. No records were found of official actions aimed at COVID-19 that addressed the territories' specificities. In total, 15 promotional actions by the communities were identified. The selection of local actors to take on specific responsibilities during the pandemic is highlighted as a relevant action. This action alone weaves together at least three of the five HP principles (equity, life cycles and empowerment). We consider that previous forms of political empowerment, such as the recognition of territories and educational initiatives, have contributed to the subjects who are leading these inventive initiatives. However, although there is scope for promotional actions, there are infrastructural limitations that only public policies could mitigate. Such actions would demand deliberate coordination between the government and social movements, which is absent in the current context of national governance.

Indexed as

COVID-19GovernmentHumansPandemicsPublic PolicyVulnerable PopulationsCOVID-19health promotionpublic policyvulnerable communities

Identifiers

PMID34383885
PMCPMC8385962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.