ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Preclinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Cryopreserved Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Corneal Repair.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05705024 (Efficacy of Locally Delivered Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Promoting Corneal Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Locally Delivered Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Promoting Corneal Repair
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Homing and Migration of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Clinical Applications: Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Barriers, and Therapeutic Optimization.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Research advances in cryopreserved preparations of mesenchymal stem cells: technical innovations, application challenges, and quality control.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Potential therapeutic applications of stem cells in animal models of ocular affections.Inflammation and regeneration · 2025Review
- Single-Atom Colloidal Nanorobotics Enhanced Stem Cell Therapy for Corneal Injury Repair.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Mitochondria Transplantation Promotes Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Intrastromal versus subconjunctival injection of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells for promoting corneal repair.The ocular surface · 2023Article
- Wound-Healing Effects of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Secretome in the Cornea and the Role of Exosomes.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Article
- Cryopreservation does not change the performance and characteristics of allogenic mesenchymal stem cells highly over-expressing a cytoplasmic therapeutic transgene for cancer treatment.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
- Current and Emerging Therapies for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.Stem cells translational medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of Cryopreservation and Freeze-Thawing on Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells and Other Common Cellular Therapeutics.Current stem cell reports · 2022Review
- Perspectives and Limitations of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Corneal Injuries and Retinal Diseases.Cell transplantationReview
- Applications of mesenchymal stem cells in ocular surface diseases: sources and routes of delivery.Expert opinion on biological therapyReview
- Preclinical Short-term and Long-term Safety of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been shown to enhance tissue repair as a cell-based therapy. In preparation for a phase I clinical study, we evaluated the safety, dosing, and efficacy of bone marrow-derived MSCs after subconjunctival injection in preclinical animal models of mice, rats, and rabbits. Methods: Human bone marrow-derived MSCs were expanded to passage 4 and cryopreserved. Viability of MSCs after thawing and injection through small-gauge needles was evaluated by vital dye staining. The in vivo safety of human and rabbit MSCs was studied by subconjunctivally injecting MSCs in rabbits with follow-up to 90 days. The potency of MSCs on accelerating wound healing was evaluated in vitro using a scratch assay and in vivo using 2-mm corneal epithelial debridement wounds in mice. Human MSCs were tracked after subconjunctival injection in rat and rabbit eyes. Results: The viability of MSCs after thawing and immediate injection through 27- and 30-gauge needles was 93.1% ± 2.1% and 94.9% ± 1.3%, respectively. Rabbit eyes demonstrated mild self-limiting conjunctival inflammation at the site of injection with human but not rabbit MSCs. In scratch assay, the mean wound healing area was 93.5% ± 12.1% in epithelial cells co-cultured with MSCs compared with 40.8% ± 23.1% in controls. At 24 hours after wounding, all MSC-injected murine eyes had 100% corneal wound closure compared with 79.9% ± 5.5% in controls. Human MSCs were detectable in the subconjunctival area and peripheral cornea at 14 days after injection. Conclusions: Subconjunctival administration of MSCs is safe and effective in promoting corneal epithelial wound healing in animal models. Translational Relevance: These results provide preclinical data to support a phase I clinical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.