Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383874›Full record

SynthesisTranslational vision science & technology2021

Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review.

Luke E Hallum, Steven C Dakin

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Visual Function in Retinal Gene Therapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Preparing participants for the use of the tongue visual sensory substitution device.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Retinal Organoids and Retinal Prostheses: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Testing Vision Is Not Testing For Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke E HallumDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Steven C DakinSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary disease causing photoreceptor degeneration and permanent vision loss. Retinal implantation of a stimulating electrode array is a new treatment for RP, but quantification of its efficacy is the subject of ongoing work. This review evaluates vision-related outcomes resulting from retinal implantation in participants with RP. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for journal articles published since January 1, 2015. We selected articles describing studies of implanted participants that reported the postimplantation measurement of vision. We extracted study information including design, participants' residual vision, comparators, and assessed outcomes. To assess the risk of bias, we used signaling questions and a target trial. Results: Our search returned 425 abstracts. We reviewed the full text of 34 articles. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias owing to the study design or experimental conduct. Regarding design, studies lacked the measures that typical clinical trials take to protect against bias (e.g., control groups and masking). Regarding experimental conduct, outcome measures were rarely comparable before and after implantation, and psychophysical methods were prone to bias (subjective, not forced choice, methods). The most common comparison found was between postimplantation visual function with the device powered off versus on. This comparison is at high risk of bias. Conclusions: There is a need for high-quality evidence of efficacy of retinal implantation to treat RP. Translational Relevance: For patients and clinicians to make informed choices about RP treatment, visual function restored by retinal implantation must be properly quantified and reported.

Indexed as

Retinitis PigmentosaElectronicsHumansProstheses and ImplantsRetinaVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID34383874
PMCPMC8362638
OpenAlexW3187363281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.