SynthesisTranslational vision science & technology2021
Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and Preclinical Validation of an Eyeglass-Coupled Perilimbal Antenna for Retinal Prostheses With a Biocompatible Graft Technique.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Assessing Visual Function in Retinal Gene Therapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Bionic vision technologies: progress and perspectives on retinal prostheses and optogenetics for the treatment of advanced retinal degeneration.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- A novel simulation paradigm utilising MRI-derived phosphene maps for cortical prosthetic vision.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Bi-directional electrical recording and stimulation of the intact retina with a screen-printed soft probe: a feasibility study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Preparing participants for the use of the tongue visual sensory substitution device.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2022Article
- In Vitro Cytotoxicity of D18 and Y6 as Potential Organic Photovoltaic Materials for Retinal Prostheses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Sequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- Retinal Organoids and Retinal Prostheses: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Testing Vision Is Not Testing For Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Do retinal implants provide long-term efficacy, safety and improve quality of life? A systematic review.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
- Improve harms reporting in trials of microelectronic retinal implants.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary disease causing photoreceptor degeneration and permanent vision loss. Retinal implantation of a stimulating electrode array is a new treatment for RP, but quantification of its efficacy is the subject of ongoing work. This review evaluates vision-related outcomes resulting from retinal implantation in participants with RP. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for journal articles published since January 1, 2015. We selected articles describing studies of implanted participants that reported the postimplantation measurement of vision. We extracted study information including design, participants' residual vision, comparators, and assessed outcomes. To assess the risk of bias, we used signaling questions and a target trial. Results: Our search returned 425 abstracts. We reviewed the full text of 34 articles. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias owing to the study design or experimental conduct. Regarding design, studies lacked the measures that typical clinical trials take to protect against bias (e.g., control groups and masking). Regarding experimental conduct, outcome measures were rarely comparable before and after implantation, and psychophysical methods were prone to bias (subjective, not forced choice, methods). The most common comparison found was between postimplantation visual function with the device powered off versus on. This comparison is at high risk of bias. Conclusions: There is a need for high-quality evidence of efficacy of retinal implantation to treat RP. Translational Relevance: For patients and clinicians to make informed choices about RP treatment, visual function restored by retinal implantation must be properly quantified and reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.