Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Changes in the top 25 reasons for primary care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in a high-COVID region of Canada.

Ellen Stephenson, Debra A Butt, Jessica Gronsbell, Catherine Ji, Braden O'Neill, Noah Crampton, Karen Tu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen StephensonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1869-0073
Debra A ButtDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica GronsbellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine JiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Braden O'NeillDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Noah CramptonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karen TuDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to determine the degree to which reasons for primary care visits changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe used data from the University of Toronto Practice Based Research Network (UTOPIAN) to compare the most common reasons for primary care visits before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the number of visits and the number of patients seen for each of the 25 most common diagnostic codes. The proportion of visits involving virtual care was assessed as a secondary outcome.

resultsUTOPIAN family physicians (N = 379) conducted 702,093 visits, involving 264,942 patients between March 14 and December 31, 2019 (pre-pandemic period), and 667,612 visits, involving 218,335 patients between March 14 and December 31, 2020 (pandemic period). Anxiety was the most common reason for visit, accounting for 9.2% of the total visit volume during the pandemic compared to 6.5% the year before. Diabetes and hypertension remained among the top 5 reasons for visit during the pandemic, but there were 23.7% and 26.2% fewer visits and 19.5% and 28.8% fewer individual patients accessing care for diabetes and hypertension, respectively. Preventive care visits were substantially reduced, with 89.0% fewer periodic health exams and 16.2% fewer well-baby visits. During the pandemic, virtual care became the dominant care format (77.5% virtual visits). Visits for anxiety and depression were the most common reasons for a virtual visit (90.6% virtual visits).

conclusionThe decrease in primary care visit volumes during the COVID-19 pandemic varied based on the reason for the visit, with increases in visits for anxiety and decreases for preventive care and visits for chronic diseases. Implications of increased demands for mental health services and gaps in preventive care and chronic disease management may require focused efforts in primary care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Office VisitsPrimary Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemics

Identifiers

PMID34383844
PMCPMC8360367
OpenAlexW3190872191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.