Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383836›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

"Spoiled" girls: Understanding social influences on adolescent contraceptive decision-making in Kenya.

Elizabeth K Harrington, Edinah Casmir, Peninah Kithao, John Kinuthia, Grace John-Stewart, Alison L Drake, Jennifer A Unger, Kenneth Ngure

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth K HarringtonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8196-069X
Edinah CasmirKenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Clinical Research, Thika, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-9568-721X
Peninah KithaoDepartment of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
John KinuthiaDepartment of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Grace John-StewartDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alison L DrakeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jennifer A UngerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kenneth NgureDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEKenyatta National Hospital · KE

Funding

WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENTK12HD001264 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Barbara Ann Goff · 1998 to 2026
$8.6M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite significant public health emphasis on unintended pregnancy prevention among adolescent girls and young women in Sub-Saharan Africa, there is a gap in understanding how adolescents' own reproductive priorities and the social influences on their decision-making align and compete. We examined the social context of contraceptive decision-making among Kenyan female adolescents.

methodsUsing community-based sampling, we conducted 40 in-depth interviews and 6 focus group discussions among sexually-active or partnered adolescent girls and young women aged 15-19 in the Nyanza region of Kenya. We analyzed the data in Dedoose using an inductive, grounded theory approach, and developed a conceptual model from the data illustrating social influences on adolescent contraceptive decision-making.

resultsParticipants viewed adolescent pregnancy as unacceptable, and described severe social, financial, and health consequences of unintended pregnancy, including abortion under unsafe conditions. Yet, their contraceptive behaviors often did not reflect their desire to delay pregnancy. Contraceptive decision-making was influenced by multiple social factors, centering on the intersecting stigmas of adolescent female sexuality, pregnancy, and contraceptive use, as well as unequal power in sexual relationships. To prioritize pregnancy prevention, adolescents must navigate conflicting social norms and power dynamics, and put their perceived future fertility at risk.

conclusionsContraceptive decision-making among Kenyan female adolescents is strongly influenced by opposing social norms within families, communities, and sexual relationships, which compel them to risk stigma whether they use a contraceptive method or become pregnant as adolescents. These findings put into perspective adolescents' seemingly incongruent pregnancy preferences and contraceptive behaviors. Interventions to address adolescent unintended pregnancy should focus on supporting adolescent decision-making agency, addressing fertility-related contraceptive concerns, and promoting innovative contraceptive access points rather than increasing contraceptive prevalence.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSocial StigmaAdolescentContraception BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicKenyaPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescencePsychology, AdolescentSexual BehaviorSocial NormsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34383836
PMCPMC8360567
OpenAlexW3190650812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.