Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Influenza vaccination hesitancy in large urban centers in South America. Qualitative analysis of confidence, complacency and convenience across risk groups.

Miguel Ángel González-Block, Blanca Estela Pelcastre-Villafuerte, Daniela Riva Knauth, Andréa Fachel-Leal, Yamila Comes, Pedro Crocco, Laura Noboa, Berenice Rodríguez Zea, Mónica Ruoti, Sandra Patricia Díaz Portillo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Miguel Ángel González-BlockUniversidad Anáhuac, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7215-4768
Blanca Estela Pelcastre-VillafuerteInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Daniela Riva KnauthUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Andréa Fachel-LealUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-9579
Yamila ComesMaestría en Sistemas de Salud y Seguridad social, Universidad ISALUD, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pedro CroccoEscuela de Salud Pública de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Laura NoboaFacultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Berenice Rodríguez ZeaMinisterio de Salud, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-8878
Mónica RuotiUniversidad Iberoamericana, Asunción, Paraguay.
Sandra Patricia Díaz PortilloEvisys Consulting, Mexico City, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0530-089X
Elsa SartiSanofi Pasteur LATAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRInstituto de Salud Pública de Chile · CLInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXSanofi (Mexico) · MXUniversidad de la República de Uruguay · UYUniversidad Iberoamericana · PYUniversidad Isalud · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza vaccination coverage in countries of Latin America is low among priority risk groups, ranging from 5 to 75% among older people. This paper aims to describe and analyze the determinants of influenza vaccination hesitancy through the lens of the 3C model of confidence, complacency and convenience among middle-class, urban risk group populations in Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, countries in South America with contrasting vaccination coverage. Focus groups were conducted among four risk groups: pregnant women, mothers of children aged <6 years, adults with risk factors, and adults aged ≥60 years in samples of urban residents. Adults with risk factors expressed the most detailed perceptions about confidence in the vaccine. A wide range of perceptions regarding complacency were expressed across risk groups and countries, with pregnant women and mothers showing greater concerns while convenience had a narrower and generally more positive range of perceptions. Participants from Chile and Paraguay expressed the most contrasts regarding confidence and complacency. Information and communication strategies need to be tailored for risk groups while confidence and complacency should be addressed in synergy.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedChildCommunicationFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedMothersOrthomyxoviridaePregnancyPregnant PeopleInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34383834
PMCPMC8360613
OpenAlexW3189027226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.