Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383716›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: A Contemporary Prospective.

Mina Iskander, Titilola Ogunsola, Rithambara Ramachandran, Richard McGowan, Lama A Al-Aswad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The use of augmented reality and virtual reality for visual field expansion and visual acuity improvement in low vision rehabilitation: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. A comparative analysis of an AI-assisted virtual reality platform with technician-based examination for visual field, visual acuity, and color vision in neuro-ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Utility of Virtual Reality in Ophthalmology: A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mina IskanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, US.
Titilola OgunsolaDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, US.
Rithambara RamachandranDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, US.
Richard McGowanDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, NYU College of Dentistry, New York, New York, US.
Lama A Al-AswadDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, US.

Funding

South Texas Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Mohamad Habes · 2021 to 2026
$24.0M
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study in Vulnerable PopulationsU01DP006436 · DP · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HARK, LISA A. · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
HEY: Hispanic Eye StudyR21EY029605 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI AL-ASWAD, LAMA A, MAESTRE, GLADYS E. · 2018 to 2019
$352k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY029605NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost published systematic reviews have focused on the use of virtual reality (VR)/augmented reality (AR) technology in ophthalmology as it relates to surgical training. To date, this is the first review that investigates the current state of VR/AR technology applied more broadly to the entire field of ophthalmology.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched systematically from January 2014 through December 1, 2020. Studies that discussed VR and/or AR as it relates to the field of ophthalmology and provided information on the technology used were considered. Abstracts, non-peer-reviewed literature, review articles, studies that reported only qualitative data, and studies without English translations were excluded.

resultsA total of 77 studies were included in this review. Of these, 28 evaluated the use of VR/AR in ophthalmic surgical training/assessment and guidance, 7 in clinical training, 23 in diagnosis/screening, and 19 in treatment/therapy. 15 studies used AR, 61 used VR, and 1 used both. Most studies focused on the validity and usability of novel technologies.

conclusionsOphthalmology is a field of medicine that is well suited for the use of VR/AR. However, further longitudinal studies examining the practical feasibility, efficacy, and safety of such novel technologies, the cost-effectiveness, and medical/legal considerations are still needed. We believe that time will indeed foster further technological advances and lead to widespread use of VR/AR in routine ophthalmic practice.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityOphthalmologyVirtual RealityHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34383716
PMCPMC9167643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.