Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383690›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Evaluation of a Digital Health Initiative in Illicit Substance Use: Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Steph Kershaw, Louise Birrell, Hannah Deen, Nicola C Newton, Lexine A Stapinski, Katrina E Champion, Frances Kay-Lambkin, Maree Teesson, Cath Chapman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Knowledge and Attitudes About Crystal Methamphetamine Among Key Community Groups in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Co-design of digital public health substance use resources: A collaboration between young people and experts.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steph KershawThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2494-4391
Louise BirrellThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-1382
Hannah DeenThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-6198
Nicola C NewtonThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-2623
Lexine A StapinskiThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3656-4655
Katrina E ChampionThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-9366
Frances Kay-LambkinPriority Research Centre for Brain and Mental Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-5572
Maree TeessonThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6744-463X
Cath ChapmanThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-6862
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cracks in the Ice (CITI) community toolkit was developed to provide evidence-based, up-to-date information and resources about crystal methamphetamine to Australians. Given the high rates of internet use in the community and the potential for misinformation, CITI has the potential to play an important role in improving knowledge and challenging misconceptions surrounding crystal methamphetamine.

objectiveThis study aims to determine (1) whether the CITI toolkit is achieving its aim of disseminating evidence-based information and resources to people who use crystal methamphetamine, their family and friends, health professionals, and the general community and (2) examine the association between the use of CITI and the knowledge and attitudes about crystal methamphetamine.

methodsA cross-sectional web-based survey, open to Australian residents (aged ≥18 years), was conducted from November 2018 to March 2019. People who had previously visited the website (referred to as "website visitors" in this study) and those who had not ("naïve") were recruited. At baseline, knowledge, attitudes, and demographics were assessed. CITI website visitors then completed a series of site evaluation questions, including the System Usability Scale (SUS), and naïve participants were asked to undertake a guided site tour of a replicated version of the site before completing the evaluation questions and repeating knowledge and attitude scales.

resultsOf a total 2108 participants, 564 (26.7%) reported lifetime use of crystal methamphetamine, 434 (20.6%) were family/friends, 288 (13.7%) were health professionals, and 822 (38.9%) were community members. The average SUS score was 73.49 (SD 13.30), indicating good site usability. Health professionals reported significantly higher SUS scores than community members (P=.02) and people who used crystal methamphetamine (P<.001). Website visitors had significantly higher baseline knowledge than naïve participants (P<.001). Among naïve participants, knowledge scores increased following exposure to the website (mean 15.2, SE 0.05) compared to baseline (mean 14.4, SE 0.05; P<.001). The largest shifts in knowledge were observed for items related to prevalence, legal issues, and the effects of the drug. Stigmatizing attitude scores among the naïve group were significantly lower following exposure to CITI (mean 41.97, SE 0.21) compared to baseline (mean 44.3, SE 0.21; P<.001).

conclusionsThis study provides an innovative evaluation of a national eHealth resource. CITI is achieving its aim of disseminating evidence-based, nonstigmatizing, and useful information and resources about crystal methamphetamine to key end user groups and has received good usability scores across its target groups. Interaction with CITI led to immediate improvements in knowledge about crystal methamphetamine and a decrease in stigmatizing attitudes. CITI demonstrates the important role of digital information and support platforms for translating evidence into practice and improving knowledge and reducing stigma.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnaireseHealthhealth educationinternetmethamphetaminemobile phonepreventive psychiatrysubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID34383690
PMCPMC8386404
OpenAlexW3176828058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.