Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383284›Full record

ReviewMMW Fortschritte der Medizin2021

[Mucociliary clearance in COVID-19 - an underestimated danger area in early phase of disease?]

Thomas Wittig

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas WittigLeiter Medizin & Klinische Forschung G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co KG, Arzt für Allgemeinmedizin, Kieler Straße 11, 25551, Hohenlockstedt, Germany. t.wittig@pohl-boskamp.de.
Pohl Boskamp (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs with other inflammatory diseases, the (dry) cough in COVID-19 patients indicates that mucociliary clearance (MCC) is at least at risk, if not overloaded, damaged or largely inoperable. Coughing is an important secondary mechanism that only takes over bronchial cleansing as a replacement if the MCC has failed.

methodThe review article describes the physiology and pathophysiology of MCC and its possible role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. RESULTS AND

conclusionsHuman and animal studies as well as autopsy reports indicate that MCC could also be important for the COVID-19 pathogenesis. In primary care, MCC plays a major role in inflammatory respiratory diseases. In Germany, drugs for self-medication are approved for treatment and, due to the high quality of studies, are also recommended in the respective guidelines. A symptomatic approach to stabilize the airway barrier would also be conceivable in the early outpatient phase of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mucociliary ClearanceAnimalsCoughHumansMucusSARS-CoV-2airways barriercoughCOVID-19MCC enhancementmucociliary clearancemucus

Identifiers

PMID34383284
PMCPMC8359637
OpenAlexW3193024169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.