ReviewCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2021
Core competencies for strategic grantmaking: lessons learned from the Innovation Strategy.
Review in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Promoting Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice in Grantmaking for Health Care Research: A Pragmatic Review and Framework.Health equity · 2024Review
- Readiness for scale-up: lessons learned from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Article
- The art and science of a strategic grantmaker: the experience of the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingThe Public Health Agency of Canada Innovation Strategy (PHAC-IS) was a national strategic funding program designed to test, deliver, scale up and evaluate complex population health interventions to determine how they bring about change, the context in which they worked best and for which populations.
interventionThe PHAC-IS experience provides an opportunity to reflect on the core competencies (skills, knowledge and attitudes) for strategic grantmakers to meet the goals of a national strategic funding program focused on population health intervention research. OUTCOMES: A literature review, PHAC-IS content analysis, a document review and semi-structured interviews provided insight into a set of core competencies-organized by specific domains-that fostered a team focused on continuous improvement to apply learning and evidence from the funded projects to advance the goals of the strategic funding program. IMPLICATIONS: Given its multiple complexities and based on the experience of the PHAC-IS team, it is proposed that funding programs aimed toward bringing change at individual and systems levels for population health promotion may draw upon a set of competencies incorporating the fields of strategic grantmaking; intervention research and evaluation; and public administration. The authors suggest that competency in the field of cultural safety is also pertinent to the successful management and leadership of public health programs, innovations and knowledge mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.