ReviewCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2021
Linking to and addressing the determinants of health: a review of the Innovation Strategy experience.
Review in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Readiness for scale-up: lessons learned from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingThis review focuses on the work of the Equipping Canadians: Mental Health throughout Life and Achieving Healthier Weights in Canada's Communities projects funded under the Public Health Agency of Canada Innovation Strategy (PHAC-IS) during the latter half of phase 2 (2013/14).
interventionThe PHAC-IS was a national strategic grantmaking program that funded the testing and delivery of evidence-based population health interventions between 2009 and 2020. A key objective of the PHAC-IS was to support work to address underlying determinants of health for priority public health problems. OUTCOMES: Overall, PHAC-IS funded projects most frequently linked to culture, social environment, and personal health practices and coping skills when phase 2 performance reports were reviewed against identified determinants of health. While the same pattern of prominent linkages was seen in the mental health funding stream, projects funded under the healthy weights stream differed slightly, most frequently linking to the social environment, followed by personal health practices and coping skills, as well as the physical environment.
conclusionPopulation health programming funded by the PHAC-IS has reported cursory links with the determinants of health. This corresponds with the PHAC-IS program's original intent to address these determinants that crosscut jurisdictions, sectors, and ecological levels, and underscores the need for more sustained capture of work around health equity and the determinants of health at the systems level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.