Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383265›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2021

Readiness for scale-up: lessons learned from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.

Shannon Bradley Dexter, Leslie Payne, Kelly Kavanagh Salmond, Sarah Mahato, Marie C Chia, Kerry Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Methodological considerations for evaluating scale-up programmes in healthcare: a methods review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Monitoring vested health partnerships.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  5. Linking to and addressing the determinants of health: a review of the Innovation Strategy experience.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shannon Bradley DexterHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Shannon.BradleyDexter@canada.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-2850
Leslie PayneHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kelly Kavanagh SalmondHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah MahatoHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Marie C ChiaOffice of the Chief Public Health Officer/Bureau de l'administrateur en chef de la santé publique, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Kerry RobinsonOffice of Strategic Policy and Planning/Bureau des politiques et de la planification stratégique, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingThe Public Health Agency of Canada Innovation Strategy (PHAC-IS) funded the development and delivery of interventions that addressed priority population health issues over a 10-year period between 2009 and 2020. The design of the PHAC-IS funding program integrated the intentional effort of scale-up to increase the reach and impact of proven population health promotion interventions towards long-term, sustained impact benefit at individual, community, and systems levels.

interventionRecognizing that social innovation and adaptive cycles are necessary for effective scale-up, the PHAC-IS developed and applied a Scale-up Readiness Assessment Tool (SRAT) to assess the level of scale-up readiness of a funded project. OUTCOMES: Development of the SRAT included identifying predictors of success for the scale-up of effective population health interventions, organized into eight common characteristics among projects that indicated scale-up readiness: (1) intervention evidence and evaluation, (2) reach and scale, (3) organizational capacity, (4) partnership development, (5) system readiness, (6) community context, (7) cost factors, and (8) knowledge development and exchange. IMPLICATIONS: Although the SRAT was not a standalone decision-making rubric, it was a key part of a framework for review, consideration, and assessment for scale-up along a phased approach to funding. The development and application of the SRAT to measure readiness for scale-up provides insights into domains that can be used by funding organizations to inform scale-up decisions or for community organizations to assess their own readiness for scale-up.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationProgram EvaluationPublic Health AdministrationCanadaHumansPolicy changePopulation health interventionScale-upScale-up readinessStrategic grantmaking

Identifiers

PMID34383265
PMCPMC8360256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.