ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2021
Readiness for scale-up: lessons learned from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equity considerations when making decisions to scale-up health interventions: a review and analysis of scalability assessment resources.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Methodological considerations for evaluating scale-up programmes in healthcare: a methods review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Review
- The art and science of a strategic grantmaker: the experience of the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Article
- Monitoring vested health partnerships.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Article
- Linking to and addressing the determinants of health: a review of the Innovation Strategy experience.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingThe Public Health Agency of Canada Innovation Strategy (PHAC-IS) funded the development and delivery of interventions that addressed priority population health issues over a 10-year period between 2009 and 2020. The design of the PHAC-IS funding program integrated the intentional effort of scale-up to increase the reach and impact of proven population health promotion interventions towards long-term, sustained impact benefit at individual, community, and systems levels.
interventionRecognizing that social innovation and adaptive cycles are necessary for effective scale-up, the PHAC-IS developed and applied a Scale-up Readiness Assessment Tool (SRAT) to assess the level of scale-up readiness of a funded project. OUTCOMES: Development of the SRAT included identifying predictors of success for the scale-up of effective population health interventions, organized into eight common characteristics among projects that indicated scale-up readiness: (1) intervention evidence and evaluation, (2) reach and scale, (3) organizational capacity, (4) partnership development, (5) system readiness, (6) community context, (7) cost factors, and (8) knowledge development and exchange. IMPLICATIONS: Although the SRAT was not a standalone decision-making rubric, it was a key part of a framework for review, consideration, and assessment for scale-up along a phased approach to funding. The development and application of the SRAT to measure readiness for scale-up provides insights into domains that can be used by funding organizations to inform scale-up decisions or for community organizations to assess their own readiness for scale-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.