Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383264›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2021

The art and science of a strategic grantmaker: the experience of the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.

Shannon Bradley Dexter, Kelly Kavanagh Salmond, Leslie Payne, Marie C Chia, Erica Di Ruggiero, Sarah Mahato

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Readiness for scale-up: lessons learned from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  6. Revisiting the Innovation Strategy performance measurement process: insights from practice.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  7. Monitoring vested health partnerships.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  8. Linking to and addressing the determinants of health: a review of the Innovation Strategy experience.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Review
  9. Core competencies for strategic grantmaking: lessons learned from the Innovation Strategy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon Bradley DexterHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Shannon.BradleyDexter@canada.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-2850
Kelly Kavanagh SalmondHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Leslie PayneHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marie C ChiaHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Erica Di RuggieroDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sarah MahatoHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch/Direction générale de la promotion de la santé et de la prévention des maladies chroniques, Public Health Agency of Canada/Agence de la santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Public Health Agency of Canada N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingThe Public Health Agency of Canada's Innovation Strategy (PHAC-IS) was established amid calls for diverse structural funding mechanisms that could support research agendas to inform policy making across multiple levels and jurisdictions. Influenced by a shifting emphasis towards a population health approach and growing interest in social innovation and systems change, the PHAC-IS was created as a national grantmaking program that funded the testing and delivery of promising population health interventions between 2009 and 2020.

interventionDuring its decade-long tenure, the PHAC-IS supported the development of innovative, locally driven programs that emphasized health equity, encouraged iterative learning to respond reflexively to complex public health problems (the art), while at the same time promoting and integrating population health intervention research (the science) for improved health at the individual, community, and systems levels through four program components. OUTCOMES: PHAC-IS projects reached priority audiences in over 1700 communities. Over 1400 partnerships were established by community-led organizations across multiple sectors with more than $30 million of leveraged funds. By the final phase of funding, 90% of the projects and partnership networks had a sustained impact on policy and public health practice. By the end of the program, 82% of the projects were able to continue their intervention beyond PHAC-IS funding. Through a phased approach, projects were able to adapt, reflect, and build partnership networks to impact policy and practice while increasing reach and scale towards sustainability. IMPLICATIONS: Analysis and reflection throughout the course of this initiative showed that strong partnerships that contribute sufficient time to collaboration are critical to achieving meaningful outcomes. Building on evaluation cycles that strengthen project design can ensure both scale and sustainability of project achievements. Furthermore, a flexible, phased approach allows for iterative learning and adjustments across various phases to realize sustained population and systems change. The model and reflexive approach underlying the PHAC-IS has the potential to apply to a broad range of public programs.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationPublic Health AdministrationBiomedical ResearchCanadaHumansGrants and contributionsHealth promotionHealthy weightsInnovationMental health promotionPopulation healthPopulation health intervention researchPublic healthSocial determinants of healthSystems change

Identifiers

PMID34383264
PMCPMC8360247
OpenAlexW3189565993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.