ArticleTranslational stroke research2022
Machine Learning-Enabled Determination of Diffuseness of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations from Magnetic Resonance Angiography.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning driven segmentation and quantification models for brain arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2025Pooled it
- The current landscape of machine learning-based radiomics in arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and radiomics quality score assessment.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Multi-reader evaluation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of eloquent brain arteriovenous malformation on MRA and white matter tractography in stereotactic radiosurgery.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cellular Mechanisms Underlying Endothelial and Histopathological Alterations Induced by Cerebral Angiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of auto-segmentation of brain arteriovenous malformations using multimodal imaging in stereotactic radiosurgery.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- DSA Quantitative Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Obliteration in Cerebral AVM following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- The difference of functional MR imaging in evaluating outcome of patients with diffuse and compact brain arteriovenous malformation.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- The novel imaging methods in diagnosis and assessment of cerebrovascular diseases: an overview.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Evaluation of the Spatial Relationship between Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and the Corticospinal Tract to Predict Postsurgical Motor Defects.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diffuseness of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is a significant factor in surgical outcome evaluation and hemorrhagic risk prediction. However, there are still predicaments in identifying diffuseness, such as the judging variety resulting from different experience and difficulties in quantification. The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model to automatically identify the diffuseness of bAVM niduses using three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) images. A total of 635 patients with bAVMs who underwent TOF-MRA imaging were enrolled. Three experienced neuroradiologists delineated the bAVM lesions and identified the diffuseness on TOF-MRA images, which were considered the ground-truth reference. The U-Net-based segmentation model was trained to segment lesion areas. Eight mainstream ML models were trained through the radiomic features of segmented lesions to identify diffuseness, based on which an integrated model was built and yielded the best performance. In the test set, the Dice score, F2 score, precision, and recall for the segmentation model were 0.80 [0.72-0.84], 0.80 [0.71-0.86], 0.84 [0.77-0.93], and 0.82 [0.69-0.89], respectively. For the diffuseness identification model, the ensemble-based model was applied with an area under the Receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) in the training set. The AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score for the diffuseness identification model were 0.95, 0.90, 0.81, 0.84, and 0.83, respectively, in the test set. The ML models showed good performance in automatically detecting bAVM lesions and identifying diffuseness. The method may help to judge the diffuseness of bAVMs objectively, quantificationally, and efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34383209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.