Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34383160›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

How to look for intracranial calcification in children with neurological disorders: CT, MRI, or both of them?

Davide Tonduti, Anna Pichiecchio, Carla Uggetti, Stefania Maria Bova, Simona Orcesi, Cecilia Parazzini, Luisa Chiapparini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide Tonduti *Child Neurology, Unit - COALA (Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Leukodystrophies), V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Via Castelvetro 32, 20154, Milan, Italy. davidetondu@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9371-7454
Anna Pichiecchio *Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Carla UggettiNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Stefania Maria BovaChild Neurology, Unit - COALA (Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Leukodystrophies), V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Via Castelvetro 32, 20154, Milan, Italy.
Simona OrcesiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Cecilia Parazzini *Paediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology Department - COALA (Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Leukodystrophies), V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Luisa Chiapparini *Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Children's Center · USUniversity of Pavia · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute (IT) RC 2017-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial calcification (ICC) is an important diagnostic clue in pediatric neurology. Considering the radiation-induced cancer risk associated with computed tomography (CT), we aim to define the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences sensitive to paramagnetic/diamagnetic substances in the detection of ICC, comparing with CT scanning. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe selected MRI and CT scans performed in children affected by neurological conditions associated with ICC referred to the participating centers between 2005 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were age at neuroradiological investigation < 18 years, availability of good quality CT positive for calcification, and MRI scan that included GE or/and SWI sequences, performed no more than 6 months apart.

resultsEighty-one patients were included in the study. CT and MRI scans were reviewed by consensus. MRI failed to detect ICC in 14% of the cases. Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) was the best MRI sequence to use in this setting, followed by gradient echo imaging. In 19% of the cases, CT could have been avoided because the identification or monitoring of ICC has not been necessary for the clinical management of the patient.

conclusionIn the diagnostic workup of pediatric-onset neurological disorders of unknown cause, the first step to look for ICC should be an MRI that includes SWI and GE sequences. If ICC is absent on MRI, brain CT scanning should be performed at least once. When the identification or monitoring of ICC is unlikely to add information useful for patient's follow-up or treatment, we recommend not performing CT scanning.

Indexed as

CalcinosisNervous System DiseasesChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAicardi-Goutières syndromeBrain CTBrain MRIIntracranial calcificationLeukodystrophyLeukoencephalopathy

Identifiers

PMID34383160
OpenAlexW3187722591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.