SynthesisAnnals of hematology2021
Comparison of the effects between MPL and JAK2V617F on thrombosis and peripheral blood cell counts in patients with essential thrombocythemia: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thrombopoietin Receptor MPL in Hematopoiesis and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Physiological Roles and Pathogenic Mechanisms.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Diagnosis- and Prognosis-Related Gene Alterations inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the effects between MPL and JAK2V617F on the thrombosis risk and peripheral blood cell counts in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), we identified eligible studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Seven studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. All studies reported the peripheral blood cell counts of ET patients, and three of them reported the eligible thrombotic events. In comparing the effect of MPL versus JAK2V617F on thrombosis, 1257 ET patients (73 MPL + and 1184 JAK2V617F +) were included. MPL-positive (MPL +) ET patients had a higher risk of thrombosis than JAK2V617F-positive (JAK2V617F +) ET patients [RR = 1.80 (1.08-3.01), P = 0.025]. And 3453 ET patients (138 MPL + and 3315 JAK2V617F +) were included in the comparison of peripheral blood cell counts. Platelet counts of MPL + ET patients were higher than that of JAK2V617F + ET patients [WMD = 81.18 (31.77-130.60), P = 0.001]. MPL + ET patients had lower hemoglobin [WMD = - 11.66 (- 14.32 to - 9.00), P = 0.000] and white blood cell counts [WMD = - 1.01 (- 1.47 to - 0.56), P = 0.000] than JAK2V617F + ET patients. These findings indicate that the MPL mutation is a high-risk factor for thrombosis in ET patients, and it may be rational to include MPL mutation in the revised IPSET as a criterion for thrombosis prediction scores. And given the differences in peripheral blood, it is necessary to further study whether MPL + ET patients differ from JAK2V617F + ET patients in bleeding and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.