Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34382889›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2021

Cancer-Related Decision-Making Among Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Oncology Providers.

Katie Darabos, Allison J Berger, Lamia P Barakat, Lisa A Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond one-size-fits-all: mapping information-seeking and decision-making pathways in cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Day-to-Day Decision Making by Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katie DarabosChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3325-079X
Allison J BergerChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lamia P BarakatChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa A SchwartzChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

A Biopsychosocial Approach to Behavioral Oncology in Young AdultsK00CA222727 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI DARABOS, KATIE · 2019 to 2021
$277k
NCI NIH HHS K00 CA222727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making among adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYA) is often complex, ongoing, and multifaceted, involving caregiver and oncology provider perspectives. Engagement in decision-making against the backdrop of normative developmental processes of acquiring autonomy and gaining independence contributes to the complexity of decision-making. Semi-structured qualitative interviews from 11 AYA and caregiver dyads and eight oncology providers examined decision-making processes with specific attention to the role of shared decision-making, cognitive and emotional processes, and coping with the decision-making experience. Five decision-making patterns were identified, with

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsAdolescentDecision MakingHumansYoung Adultadolescent and young adultscancercaregiverscognition and emotiondecision-makingoncology providersqualitativeUSA

Identifiers

PMID34382889
PMCPMC9198895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.