Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34382747›Full record

ArticleMolecular nutrition & food research2021

Replacement of Nitrite in Meat Products by Natural Bioactive Compounds Results in Reduced Exposure to N-Nitroso Compounds: The PHYTOME Project.

Simone G van Breda, Karen Mathijs, Harm-Jan Pieters, Virág Sági-Kiss, Gunter G Kuhnle, Panagiotis Georgiadis, Giovanna Saccani, Giovanni Parolari, Roberta Virgili, Rashmi Sinha and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect ofHeliyon · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Simone G van BredaDepartment of Toxicogenomics, GROW-school for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1421-8214
Karen MathijsDepartment of Toxicogenomics, GROW-school for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Harm-Jan PietersDepartment of Toxicogenomics, GROW-school for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Virág Sági-KissDepartment of Food & Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Gunter G KuhnleDepartment of Food & Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Panagiotis GeorgiadisNational Hellenic Research Foundation, Institute of Biology, Medicinal Chemistry and Biotechnology, Athens, Greece.
Giovanna SaccaniSSICA-Experimental Station for the Food Preserving Industry, Parma, Italy.
Giovanni ParolariSSICA-Experimental Station for the Food Preserving Industry, Parma, Italy.
Roberta VirgiliSSICA-Experimental Station for the Food Preserving Industry, Parma, Italy.
Rashmi SinhaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gert HemkeHemke Nutriconsult, Prins Clauslaan 70, 5684 GB Best, The Netherlands.
Yung HungDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Gent, 9000, Belgium.
Wim VerbekeDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Gent, 9000, Belgium.
Ad A MascleeDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carla B Vleugels-SimonZuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Adriaan A van BodegravenZuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Theo M de KokDepartment of Toxicogenomics, GROW-school for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
PHYTOME consortiumDepartment of Toxicogenomics, GROW-school for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLExperimental Station for the Food Preserving Industry · ITGhent University · BEUniversity of Reading · GBZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLNational Hellenic Research Foundation · GRNational Institutes of Health · USNutricia Research (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

Lower Gastrointestinal Cancer StudiesZIACP010198 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SINHA, RASHMI · 2009 to 2025
$6.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

scopeIt has been proposed that endogenously form N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) are partly responsible for the link between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. As nitrite has been indicated as critical factor in the formation of NOCs, the impact of replacing the additive sodium nitrite (E250) by botanical extracts in the PHYTOME project is evaluated. METHOD AND

resultsA human dietary intervention study is conducted in which healthy subjects consume 300 g of meat for 2 weeks, in subsequent order: conventional processed red meat, white meat, and processed red meat with standard or reduced levels of nitrite and added phytochemicals. Consumption of red meat products enriched with phytochemicals leads to a significant reduction in the faecal excretion of NOCs, as compared to traditionally processed red meat products. Gene expression changes identify cell proliferation as main affects molecular mechanism. High nitrate levels in drinking water in combination with processed red meat intake further stimulates NOC formation, an effect that could be mitigated by replacement of E250 by natural plant extracts.

conclusionThese findings suggest that addition of natural extracts to conventionally processed red meat products may help to reduce CRC risk, which is mechanistically support by gene expression analyses.

Indexed as

Meat ProductsRed MeatAdultCaco-2 CellsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleNitritesNitroso CompoundsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsYoung AdultNitritesNitroso CompoundsPhytochemicalsPlant Extractscolorectal cancer riskgene expressiongenotoxicityhuman dietary intervention study; N-nitroso compounds

Identifiers

PMID34382747
PMCPMC8530897
OpenAlexW3187187807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.