ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2021
Clinical efficacy of drug
Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAs the main implant material, coronary stent is one of the main factors that affect clinical treatment outcome and patient cost. The choice for coronary stent in clinic depends on multiply factors including patient preference, medical personnel expertise and current technology, and no recognized method has been established for the evaluation and choice of coronary stent. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and economy of a few drug-eluting coronary stents in clinic.
methodsA retrospective analysis was employed to study the cases treated by drug-eluting stent intervention in a third grade hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. Based on the specific products, these cases were assigned into a domestic stent A group, a domestic stent B group, a domestic stent C group, and an imported stent group. According to the severity of the disease, they were divided into an angina pectoris, an acute myocardial infarction, and an ischemic heart disease subgroups. Layer analysis was carried out for inter-subgroup comparisons in terms of safety (indicated by mortality rate, complication rate, and infection rate), efficacy (indicated by 31-day return rate, 365-day myocardial infarction rate, restenosis rate, secondary intervention rate, and thrombosis rate), and economy (indicated by averaged total cost and coronary stent cost).
resultsAmong the 4 products, there was no difference in safety (
conclusionsWith all the indicators of these 4 stents taken into consideration, we conclude that hospitals may appropriately increase the share of domestic coronary stent in product selection and in-hospital management. This measure helps increase product localization rate and ease the financial burden for patients by reducing coronary stent cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.