Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34382505›Full record

ArticleJournal of histotechnology2022

Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.

C Broomfield, N Meis, J Johnson, D Regan, K McGilvray, C Puttlitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of histotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C BroomfieldOrthopaedic Bioengineering Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
N MeisOrthopaedic Bioengineering Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
J JohnsonOrthopaedic Bioengineering Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7465-3854
D ReganFlint Animal Cancer Center, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, & Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
K McGilvrayOrthopaedic Bioengineering Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
C PuttlitzOrthopaedic Bioengineering Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

Elucidating the role and regulation of periostin in therapy-induced chemoresistance in metastatic breast cancerK01OD022982 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI REGAN, DANIEL PATRICK · 2016 to 2021
$720k
NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR002126NIH HHS K01 OD022982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many published methods of decalcifying bone for paraffin histology; however, the current literature lacks details regarding the processing of ovine tissue. Ovine bone tissue presents challenges, as samples are often denser and larger than other comparative animal models, thus increasing decalcification times. Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFAA) has previously been used to decalcify ovine bone samples for histological analysis. Unfortunately, TFAA is a strong acid and often results in loss of cellular detail, especially in the connected soft tissue. This is generally manifested as over staining with eosin, and a decrease in cellular features which impacts overall histological interpretation. It is well known that leaving tissue in acid for long periods degrades cellular detail; therefore, minimizing decalcification time is critical to accurately determine cellular morphology. Six decalcification solutions (8% TFAA, 20% TFAA, 8% formic acid, 20% formic acid, Formical-4, and XLCal, and three temperatures (room temperature, 30°C, 37°C), were examined to determine their effects on cellular detail in ovine vertebrae and humeral heads. These data clearly indicate that 20% formic acid at 30°C yielded better decalcification rates (2.6 d ± 0.9 d) and cellular detail (none to mild changes) for the vertebrae samples, and 20% formic acid at RT yielded the best cellular detail (none to minimal loss) for humerus samples with a moderate amount of time (6.5 d ± 1.7). These results should establish the optimal demineralization procedures for ovine bone used in scientific studies resulting in improved cellular detail while minimizing decalcification times.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesHistological TechniquesAnimalsDecalcification TechniqueEosine Yellowish-(YS)SheepSheep, DomesticStaining and LabelingEosine Yellowish-(YS)bonedecalcificationH&Elarge format histologyOvineparaffin embedding

Identifiers

PMID34382505
PMCPMC9367626
OpenAlexW3192045068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.