ArticleNursing in critical care2022
Reliability of monitoring acid-base and electrolyte parameters through circuit lines during regional citrate anticoagulation-continuous renal replacement therapy.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe current practice involves blood sampling from the circuit line to measure acid-base and electrolyte parameters during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, there is limited evidence supporting its reliability due to the effects of anticoagulant mechanism and access recirculation associated with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA).
aimTo evaluate the reliability of monitoring acid-base and electrolyte parameters through circuit lines in regular and reversed connections during RCA-CRRT. STUDY
designIn this prospective cohort study, we included critically ill patients receiving RCA-CRRT via a double-lumen catheter. During the second hour after CRRT initiation, we collected blood samples to monitor acid-base and electrolyte parameters and their levels were compared between samples from the circuit lines (at 0, 3, and 5 minutes) and those from the central venous catheter (CVC) line (at 0 minute). During this time, CRRT switched to the replacement state as controls.
resultsWe observed 128 CRRT circuits in 60 adult patients receiving RCA-CRRT. Ninety-eight (76.6%) circuits had regular connections, while 30 (23.4%) had reversed connections. Among regular connections, no differences were observed in any acid-base or electrolyte parameters between samples from the CVC line and those from the circuit line at all time points (P > .05). Among reversed connections, ionized calcium levels were dramatically decreased at all three time points in samples from the circuit line compared with those from the CVC line (0.65 ± 0.12, 0.72 ± 0.11, and 0.78 ± 0.99 vs 0.98 ± 0.07 mmol/L, P < .001), with comparable levels of other acid-base or electrolyte parameters between the sampling patterns (P > .05).
conclusionsAcid-base and electrolyte parameters could be reliably monitored through the circuit line during RCA-CRRT in regular connections. However, in reversed connections, pre-filter ionized calcium concentrations determined through the circuit line were lower than those determined through the CVC line. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: We suggest sampling from arterial or CVC lines rather than from the circuit line in a reversed connection during RCA-CRRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.