Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34382254›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2021

Abdominal cancer symptoms: Evaluation of the impact of a regional public awareness campaign.

Nicola Torrance, Chloe J Bright, Helen L Hill, Jennie Fergusson, Catriona Kennedy, Vivian Mak, Carolynn Gildea, Andy Nordin, Lucy Elliss-Brookes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola TorranceSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-7408
Chloe J BrightNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), Public Health England, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6105-0560
Helen L HillNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), Public Health England, London, UK.
Jennie FergussonPublic Health England Marketing, London, UK.
Catriona KennedySchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-9113
Vivian MakNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), Public Health England, London, UK.
Carolynn GildeaNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), Public Health England, London, UK.
Andy NordinEast Kent Gynaecological Centre, QEQM Hospital, Kent, UK.
Lucy Elliss-BrookesNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), Public Health England, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1159-6607
Public Health England · GBRobert Gordon University · GBKent Hospital · US

Funding

Public Health England
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA regional 'Be Clear on Cancer' (BCoC) campaign developed by Public Health England aimed to promote public awareness of key abdominal cancer symptoms in people aged 50 years and over.

methodsData were analysed for metrics at different stages in the patient care pathway including public awareness, GP attendance and referrals, to cancer diagnosis.

resultsThere was significantly higher recognition of the BCoC abdominal campaign in the campaign region compared to the control area (Post Campaign/Control, n = 401/406; 35% vs. 24%, p < 0.05). The campaign significantly improved knowledge of 'bloating' as a symptom (p = 0.03) compared to pre-campaign levels. GP attendances for abdominal symptoms increased significantly by 5.8% (p = 0. 03), although the actual increase per practice was small (average 16.8 visits per week in 2016 to 17.7 in 2017). Urgent GP referrals for suspected abdominal cancer increased by 7.6%, compared to a non-significant change (0.05%) in the control area. For specific abdominal cancers, the number diagnosed were similar to or higher than the median in the campaign area but not in the control area in people aged 50 and over: colorectal (additional n = 61 cancers), pancreatic (additional n = 102) and stomach cancers (additional n = 17).

conclusionsThis campaign had a modest impact on public awareness of abdominal cancer symptoms, GP attendances and cancers diagnosed.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerStomach NeoplasmsAgedAwarenessHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedPublic HealthReferral and Consultationabdominal symptomscancer awarenesshealth promotionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID34382254
PMCPMC9285941
OpenAlexW3192616350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.