Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34382242›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2021

Risk factors for excess deaths during lockdown among older users of secondary care mental health services without confirmed COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study.

Shanquan Chen, Peter B Jones, Benjamin R Underwood, Emilio Fernandez-Egea, Pei Qin, Jonathan R Lewis, Rudolf N Cardinal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Has COVID-19 affected dementia diagnosis rates in England?International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shanquan ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4724-4892
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-880X
Benjamin R UnderwoodDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-9487
Emilio Fernandez-EgeaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-8955
Pei QinDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Shenzhen University Health Science Centre, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-0379
Jonathan R LewisCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1821-3824
Rudolf N CardinalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8751-5167

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17213NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of EnglandUK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate factors contributing to excess deaths of older patients during the initial 2020 lockdown beyond those attributable to confirmed COVID-19.

methodsRetrospective cohort study comparing patients treated between 23 March 2020 and 14 June 2020, deemed exposed to the pandemic/lockdown, to patients treated between 18 December 2019 and 10 March 2020, deemed to be unexposed. Data came from electronic clinical records from secondary care mental health services in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT), UK (catchment area population ∼0.86 million). Eligible patients were aged 65 years or over at baseline with at least 14 days' follow-up, excluding patients diagnosed with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

findingsIn the two cohorts, 3,073 subjects were exposed to lockdown and 4,372 subjects were unexposed; the cohorts were followed up for an average of 74 and 78 days, respectively. After controlling for confounding by sociodemographic factors, smoking status, mental comorbidities, and physical comorbidities, patients with dementia suffered an additional 53% risk of death (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.02-2.31), and patients with severe mental illness suffered an additional 123% risk of death (HR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.42-3.49). No significant additional mortality risks were identified from physical comorbidities, potentially due to low statistical power in that respect.

conclusionDuring lockdown people with dementia or severe mental illness had a higher risk of death without confirmed COVID-19. These data could inform future health service responses and policymaking to help prevent avoidable excess death during future outbreaks of this or a similar infectious disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesCommunicable Disease ControlHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Secondary Health CareCOVID-19excess deathslockdownretrospective cohort studyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34382242
PMCPMC8420159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.