Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34382127›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2022

Pixel-CO

Agnieszka Aleksandra Nalewczynska, Michael Barwijuk, Piotr Kolczewski, Ewa Dmoch-Gajzlerska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Fractional COInternational urogynecology journal · 2023
    Trial
  4. Fractional COInternational urogynecology journal · 2026
    Article
  5. Thermo-Ablative Fractional COMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. COTherapeutic advances in urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Agnieszka Aleksandra NalewczynskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Didactics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 14/16 Litewska Street, 00-575, Warsaw, Poland. agnieszka.nalewczynska@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6643-4758
Michael BarwijukMedifem Clinic, 488th Pulawska Street, 02-884, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr KolczewskiEsthegyn Clinic, 7th Mazurska Street, 71-899, Szczecin, Poland.
Ewa Dmoch-GajzlerskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Didactics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 14/16 Litewska Street, 00-575, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLMeta (Israel) · ILMother and Child Foundation · GBPomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive pixel-CO

Indexed as

Lasers, GasUrinary Incontinence, StressCarbon DioxideFemaleHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeCarbon DioxideFractional laserFractional-pixel laserPixel CO2 laserQuality of lifeStress urinary incontinenceVaginal CO2 laser

Identifiers

PMID34382127
PMCPMC8918174
OpenAlexW3188543834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.