Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381992›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2021

A scoping review of current practices on community engagement in rural East Africa: Recommendations for snakebite envenoming.

Bethany Moos, David Williams, Isabelle Bolon, Denise Mupfasoni, Bernadette Abela-Ridder, Rafael Ruiz de Castaneda

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bethany MoosHedena Health, 207 London Road, Headington, Oxford, UK.
David WilliamsDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Isabelle BolonInstitute of Global Health, Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, CH-1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Denise MupfasoniDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Bernadette Abela-RidderDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Rafael Ruiz de CastanedaDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine & Institute of Global Health, Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community empowerment and engagement is one of the four strategic aims highlighted in the WHO strategy to prevent and control snakebite envenoming. Inappropriate health-seeking behaviours contribute to adverse outcomes, and community engagement is key in driving behavioural change. WHO has highlighted East Africa as a geographical area of concern for snakebite envenoming. The overall aim of the project is to develop a community engagement toolkit for snakebite envenoming and other NTDs. The objective of this scoping review was to identify current practices in recent community engagement in rural East Africa; the applicability of these results to snakebite envenoming are discussed.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity engagementNeglected tropical diseasesOne healthPublic healthSnakebite envenoming

Identifiers

PMID34381992
PMCPMC8334718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.