Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381936›Full record

ArticleDesign for health (Abingdon, England)2021

Supporting eating behaviour of community-dwelling older adults: co-design of an embodied conversational agent.

Lean L Kramer, Marije Blok, Lex van Velsen, Bob C Mulder, Emely de Vet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Design for health (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lean L KramerConsumption and Healthy Lifestyles group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1409-2853
Marije BlokDepartment of Sociology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-5590
Lex van VelsenRoessingh Research and Development, eHealth cluster, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0599-8706
Bob C MulderStrategic Communication group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-1370
Emely de VetConsumption and Healthy Lifestyles group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4452-2367
Wageningen University & Research · NLNational Foundation for the Elderly · NLRoessingh Research and Development · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to support community-dwelling older adults with healthy eating behaviours, Embodied Conversational Agents (ECAs) may be an effective and engaging medium. However, ECAs have not yet been found to be capable of engendering behaviour change, which is partly attributed to the absence of a match with users' practices, needs and preferences. Hence, we describe a co-design process with older adults that informs both the content and the appearance of an ECA. Data was gathered through three consecutive iterations of co-design sessions with two groups of community-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands. Prior to the first session, participants completed a seven-day lifestyle diary. This study adds knowledge on the meaning of healthy eating, as well as on specific barriers to, and opportunities for, giving advice using an ECA in this target group. Furthermore, we translate this knowledge into general advice for designing an ECA in the context of health behaviour change, while reflecting on a co-design process with older adults.

Indexed as

Co-designeating behaviorembodied conversational agentolder adults

Identifiers

PMID34381936
PMCPMC8300522
OpenAlexW3135806301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.