Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381873›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2021

An automated approach to identify scientific publications reporting pharmacokinetic parameters.

Ferran Gonzalez Hernandez, Simon J Carter, Juha Iso-Sipilä, Paul Goldsmith, Ahmed A Almousa, Silke Gastine, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Frank Kloprogge, Joseph F Standing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ferran Gonzalez HernandezCoMPLEX, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-7557
Simon J CarterInstitute of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-2321
Juha Iso-SipiläBenevolentAI, London, UK.
Paul GoldsmithEli Lilly and Company, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9909-2536
Ahmed A AlmousaLondon Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
Silke GastineGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Watjana LilaonitkulInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1742-7583
Frank KloproggeInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-4559
Joseph F StandingGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M008665/1Medical Research Council MR/S004041/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) predictions of new chemical entities are aided by prior knowledge from other compounds. The development of robust algorithms that improve preclinical and clinical phases of drug development remains constrained by the need to search, curate and standardise PK information across the constantly-growing scientific literature. The lack of centralised, up-to-date and comprehensive repositories of PK data represents a significant limitation in the drug development pipeline.In this work, we propose a machine learning approach to automatically identify and characterise scientific publications reporting PK parameters from in vivo data, providing a centralised repository of PK literature. A dataset of 4,792 PubMed publications was labelled by field experts depending on whether in vivo PK parameters were estimated in the study. Different classification pipelines were compared using a bootstrap approach and the best-performing architecture was used to develop a comprehensive and automatically-updated repository of PK publications. The best-performing architecture encoded documents using unigram features and mean pooling of BioBERT embeddings obtaining an F1 score of 83.8% on the test set. The pipeline retrieved over 121K PubMed publications in which in vivo PK parameters were estimated and it was scheduled to perform weekly updates on newly published articles. All the relevant documents were released through a publicly available web interface (https://app.pkpdai.com) and characterised by the drugs, species and conditions mentioned in the abstract, to facilitate the subsequent search of relevant PK data. This automated, open-access repository can be used to accelerate the search and comparison of PK results, curate ADME datasets, and facilitate subsequent text mining tasks in the PK domain.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsInformation extractionMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingPharmacokineticsPharmacometricsText mining

Identifiers

PMID34381873
PMCPMC8343403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.