Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381839›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2021

Erratum: "Comparison between traditional and nontraditional add-on devices used with pressurised metered-dose inhalers". Mina Nicola, Youssef M.A. Soliman, Raghda Hussein, Haitham Saeed and Mohamed Abdelrahim.

Abstract readPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00073-2020.]. This article has been republished with a correction to the Discussion section. “Hence, using a drinking bottle spacer, while doubling the dose, would be helpful and cost effective, especially in poor and developing communities” has been changed to “Hence, using a drinking bottle spacer, while doubling the initial dose, would be helpful and cost effective, especially in poor and developing communities”.

Identifiers

PMID34381839
PMCPMC8350124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.