ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2021
IEEE P7001: A Proposed Standard on Transparency.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responsibility Gaps, LLMs & Organisations: Many Agents, Many Levels, and Many Interactions.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- The power of justifications to repair human-robot trust, even under moral disagreement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Trust, trustworthiness and AI governance.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Human perceptions of social robot deception behaviors: an exploratory analysis.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
- Security Aspects of Social Robots in Public Spaces: A Systematic Mapping Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The assessment list for trustworthy artificial intelligence: A review and recommendations.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- The "Transparency for Safety" Triangle: Developing a Smart Transparency Framework to Achieve a Safety Learning Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Let Me Take Over: Variable Autonomy for Meaningful Human Control.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Roboethics principles and policies in Europe and North America.SN applied sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes IEEE P7001, a new draft standard on transparency of autonomous systems. In the paper, we outline the development and structure of the draft standard. We present the rationale for transparency as a measurable, testable property. We outline five stakeholder groups: users, the general public and bystanders, safety certification agencies, incident/accident investigators and lawyers/expert witnesses, and explain the thinking behind the normative definitions of "levels" of transparency for each stakeholder group in P7001. The paper illustrates the application of P7001 through worked examples of both specification and assessment of fictional autonomous systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.